PIBBS

Discrimination through Ambiguity: Reducing Workplace Bias Against Minority Immigrants PIBBS
"Soft skills" may not translate as easily as hoped when skilled workers immigrant to a new country, suggests a paper in the journal PIBBS.

Discrimination through Ambiguity: Reducing Workplace Bias Against Minority Immigrants

January 12, 2015 3663

Soft Skills

So-called “soft skills” may not translate as easily as hoped when skilled workers immigrant to a new country, suggests a paper in the journal Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

Skilled ethnic and religious minority immigrants are under-employed in Western nations, not only costing these economies billions of dollars but potentially complicating inter-group relations, according to a new study published in the journal Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

In the United States, 1.3 million college-educated immigrants are unemployed or underemployed. In Canada, the under-employment of immigrants is perceived to be a public policy failing.

PIBBS cover

The Federation of Associations in Behavioral and Brain Sciences, or FABBS, with SAGE, the parent of Social Science Space, publishes the journal Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. This annual journal features research findings in the sciences of mind, brain, and behavior that are applicable to nearly every area of public policy. The first issue comprises 33 articles in social and personality psychology focused on topics including health, education, justice, the environment, and inequality.

Study authors Victoria M. Esses, Caroline Bennett-AbuAyyash, and Natalia Lapshina suspect discrimination may be at work.

This particular discrimination is rationalized—that is, justified in ways that protect the perpetrators from negative social or psychological consequences, the researchers explain in “How Discrimination against Ethnic and Religious Minorities Contributes to the Underutilization of Immigrants’ Skills.”

Prejudice is defined as a negative attitude toward a social group. In employment discrimination, this attitude can be rationalized through ambiguity. Foreign credentials may be ambiguous, they explain, as may the applicant’s personal characteristics such as problem-solving, communication and teamwork.

According to the Esses, a psychologist and director of the Centre for Research on Migration and Ethnic Relations at the University of Western Ontario, and her colleagues, “Ambiguity removes the need to suppress prejudice because ambiguity essentially makes a wide range of responses seem acceptable.”

In one of several studies cited in the paper, participants were given a job applicant’s resume and a 10-minute video of the applicant’s job interview. Applicants were either native Canadians or immigrants with foreign credentials, and either Christian, having no religious preference, or Muslim, one of the fastest growing religious minority groups in North America.

Religious affiliation had no effect when the applicant was a Canadian. But when the applicant was an immigrant, being Muslim led to poorer perception of both the technical and other teachable skills as well as the personal characteristics—so-called soft skills.

In the workforce, complaints about discrimination by minorities often are met with skepticism, particularly concerning immigrant minorities whose foreign credentials and personal characteristics may be ambiguous.

In another study, participants were given one of three newspaper articles describing a claim of employment-related discrimination.

The articles were identical except for the first sentence, which identified the claimant as either a recent immigrant from Iran or England, or an individual born in Canada to parents who emigrated from Iran many years ago. The article went on to explain that the program director’s initial satisfaction with the claimant’s work turned negative, leading to job loss.

Results showed that the recent immigrant from Iran was less likely to be perceived as having experienced discrimination.

The authors remind us that most Western nations have laws prohibiting discrimination against religious and ethnic minorities. Still, subtle bias, particularly against “soft skills,” continues to result in discrimination.

Considering the current research, the under-utilization of immigrants may particular concern policy makers because of the economic and social costs, including future intergroup relations.

Recommended policy interventions include government-sponsored workshops aimed at increasing awareness of subtle bias and concerns about appearing prejudiced.

Employers would be more concerned about appearing prejudiced if monetary penalties for discrimination were levied or increased, and if governments publicly disclosed those employers who discriminate.

The authors also advise reducing the perceived ambiguity of skilled immigrants’ credentials, perhaps through training in how those ‘soft skills’ are applied in the host country.


Jennifer Anderson is a professional journalist specializing in health and science. She can be reached at jennifer_anderson@verizon.net

View all posts by Jennifer Anderson

Related Articles

All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture
Event
October 10, 2024

All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture

Read Now
Exploring the ‘Publish or Perish’ Mentality and its Impact on Research Paper Retractions
Research
October 10, 2024

Exploring the ‘Publish or Perish’ Mentality and its Impact on Research Paper Retractions

Read Now
‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land
International Debate
September 27, 2024

‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

Read Now
Daron Acemoglu on Artificial Intelligence
Social Science Bites
September 3, 2024

Daron Acemoglu on Artificial Intelligence

Read Now
Crafting the Best DEI Policies: Include Everyone and Include Evidence

Crafting the Best DEI Policies: Include Everyone and Include Evidence

Organizations shouldn’t back away from workplace DEI efforts. Rather, the research suggests, they should double down, using a more inclusive approach that emphasizes civility and dialogue – one aimed at finding common ground.

Read Now
The Public’s Statistics Should Serve, Well, the Public

The Public’s Statistics Should Serve, Well, the Public

Paul Allin sets out why the UK’s Royal Statistical Society is launching a new campaign for public statistics.

Read Now
Why, and How, We Must Contest ‘Development’

Why, and How, We Must Contest ‘Development’

Why is contestation a better starting point for studying and researching development than ‘everyone wants the same thing’?

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments