Peer Review

Webinar: How to Get More Involved with a Journal and Develop Your Career
Event
March 15, 2024

Webinar: How to Get More Involved with a Journal and Develop Your Career

Read Now
Maintaining Anonymity In Double-Blind Peer Review During The Age of Artificial Intelligence
Research
August 23, 2023

Maintaining Anonymity In Double-Blind Peer Review During The Age of Artificial Intelligence

Read Now
As We Evolve Science Policy We Must Vigilantly Assess Its Changes
Impact
August 4, 2023

As We Evolve Science Policy We Must Vigilantly Assess Its Changes

Read Now
Tipster’s Note Offers View of Academic Publishing’s Achilles Heel
Communication
July 25, 2023

Tipster’s Note Offers View of Academic Publishing’s Achilles Heel

Read Now
Upcoming Webinar Series: How To Be A Peer Reviewer

Upcoming Webinar Series: How To Be A Peer Reviewer

Sage is hosting ‘how to be a peer reviewer,’ a free webinar series that will explain the academic reviewing landscape. The event will be held on three occasions to accommodate audiences worldwide.

Read Now
Feeling Saved by Feedback? Six Strategies That Help Academics to Cope

Feeling Saved by Feedback? Six Strategies That Help Academics to Cope

Six coping strategies drawn from positive psychology can help us cope with the sting of negative feedback.

Read Now
Webinar Takes a Deep Dive into Peer Review

Webinar Takes a Deep Dive into Peer Review

In honor of Peer Review Week (September 19-23), the next in SAGE Publishing’s series of ‘how to get published’ webinars will shed […]

Read Now
We Unintentionally Hit a Nerve When Bemoaning the State of Peer Review

We Unintentionally Hit a Nerve When Bemoaning the State of Peer Review

You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to fix peer review. An astronomic number of ideas to repair peer review followed a tweet about the system.

Read Now
Introducing The Publish Your Reviews Initiative for Preprints

Introducing The Publish Your Reviews Initiative for Preprints

Ludo Waltman and Jessica Polka make the case for a more contextualized approach to open access publishing and preprinting, and introduce the Publish Your Reviews initiative.

Read Now
Don’t Mistake Cruelty for Rigor in Peer Review

Don’t Mistake Cruelty for Rigor in Peer Review

The authors – all journal editors -believe that feedback given in peer review should be rigorous, but will be more readily incorporated if kindly given, to the advancement of science.

Read Now
Co-Creation With Our Reviewers

Co-Creation With Our Reviewers

For all sorts of reasons, our article “A Design Thinking Approach to Teaching Sustainability” should not have been written. This blog entry […]

Read Now
How Metrics Affect Peer Review for Academic Jobs and Grants

How Metrics Affect Peer Review for Academic Jobs and Grants

The aim of peer review for research grants and academic hiring boards is to provide expert independent judgement on the quality of research proposals and candidates. Based on findings from a recent survey, Liv Langfeldt, Dag W. Aksnes and Ingvild Reymert, find metrics continue to play a significant role in shaping these decisions, especially for reviewers who are highly ranked themselves.

Read Now
[mailpoet_form id="1"]