Academic Funding

He who pays the piper…

September 30, 2010 1506

The Higher Education sector in the UK is about to change enormously. Put this another way, it is about to be hit by funding cuts so dramatic it will not be possible for most (if not all) universities to remain solvent just by trimming and economising. Major changes are going to be required in the way universities are run and in the services they deliver. This against a backdrop of questions about what a university is for.

Increasingly we see that politicians use the rhetoric of skills and work rather than intellect and education. This debate, whilst interesting to some, is in my view largely irrelevant since the argument is over – given that the politicians still oversee a large amount of the funding for HE, this view is the way the sector will go. Essentially University is now seen to be the transition between school and work so we in the sector need to change our outlook accordingly.

For the social sciences, there are opportunities and threats possibly in equal measure. The opportunity is in the workplace relevant skills that social science education can provide. Essential skills such as critical thinking, presentation of logical, well structured, well evidenced arguments, coping with ambiguous evidence – as well as the life enhancing knowledge about our world. But the threat is more easy to find – stories of the mickey mouse degree topic are an easy target for journalists and traditionalists and are frequently wheeled out as a stick to beat HE in general and social science in particular. I for one have never understood why the study of greek mythology is a high order cerebral activity but the study of the very real society we are in today is not. But making this argument in the world outside social sciences is the to set oneself up for a drubbing – it is the journalistic equivalent of an open goal.

We in the social sciences need to up our game in making the case for the value of our subjects. But in a way which is relevant to the milieu we find ourselves in, not the one we would like to be in. In my view, this means emphasising rigour and relevance of social sciences, cutting out anything that could be interpreted (or twisted) as being woolly or the study of the obvious. But most of all, delivering excellent service to our students by stimulating them, being responsive and first firing their imagination then keeping their attention.

Dr Patrick Tissington
Associate Dean Business Partnerships
Aston Business School
Aston University
Birmingham B4 7ET
UK

Related Articles

Deciphering the Mystery of the Working-Class Voter: A View From Britain
Insights
November 14, 2024

Deciphering the Mystery of the Working-Class Voter: A View From Britain

Read Now
Julia Ebner on Violent Extremism
Insights
November 4, 2024

Julia Ebner on Violent Extremism

Read Now
Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do
International Debate
October 23, 2024

Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do

Read Now
All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture
Event
October 10, 2024

All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture

Read Now
‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

The term ‘settler colonialism’ was coined by an Australian historian in the 1960s to describe the occupation of a territory with a […]

Read Now
Webinar: Banned Books Week 2024

Webinar: Banned Books Week 2024

As book bans and academic censorship escalate across the United States, this free hour-long webinar gathers experts to discuss the impact these […]

Read Now
Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

The creation of the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) has led to a heated debate on the balance between peer review and evaluative metrics in research assessment regimes. Luciana Balboa, Elizabeth Gadd, Eva Mendez, Janne Pölönen, Karen Stroobants, Erzsebet Toth Cithra and the CoARA Steering Board address these arguments and state CoARA’s commitment to finding ways in which peer review and bibliometrics can be used together responsibly.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kelly-Anne Lewis

Quite true. As a graduate of the social sciences, I couldn’t agree more.