Academic Funding

A new binary divide? Social science after concentration, and how to cope…

March 10, 2011 1245

Perri 6, Professor of Social Policy at Nottingham Trent University, has produced a detailed analysis of the implications of concentrating doctoral training at a restricted number of universities in the UK. While this may well result in a deep division in the sector between research and teaching universities, he argues that this is not inevitable, and sets out ways that universities can adapt to meet the challenges they face.

The national press largely missed the huge significance for higher education of the Economic and Social Research Council’s (ESRC’s) announcement in January that it will now support doctoral training in just twenty one centres. Some of these are made up of consortia of universities. Many universities which had high hopes of being awarded a centre were unsuccessful. Moreover, ESRC decided, after seeing the Treasury’s announcements of cuts in the Council’s funding, not to fund any smaller Doctoral Training Units at all. Those would have covered fewer disciplines and smaller numbers of students than the Centres. Typically, smaller universities not in consortia and post-1992 universities applied for those.

This decision is the harbinger of a much deeper degree of concentration that could lead to a stark, new division in the sector between research and teaching universities – at least in the social sciences, and in all probability quite generally. That, of course, would probably be the preference of the Russell Group anyway. It has implications for the Research Excellence Framework (REF), for ‘Quality Related’ (QR) research funding awarded in consequence of the REF, for the future of ESRC itself, for academics’ decisions about their careers, and for the choice of university that students make even for their undergraduate courses, let alone for their master’s courses.

Let’s start with what ESRC has done, before examining what it will definitely mean, and then considering a little more speculatively what it might mean – if we are not careful. To understand the scale of what has happened, it’s important to understand how the system has worked until this year…

 The full article is available as a pdf file.

Related Articles

Deciphering the Mystery of the Working-Class Voter: A View From Britain
Insights
November 14, 2024

Deciphering the Mystery of the Working-Class Voter: A View From Britain

Read Now
Julia Ebner on Violent Extremism
Insights
November 4, 2024

Julia Ebner on Violent Extremism

Read Now
Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do
International Debate
October 23, 2024

Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do

Read Now
All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture
Event
October 10, 2024

All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture

Read Now
‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

The term ‘settler colonialism’ was coined by an Australian historian in the 1960s to describe the occupation of a territory with a […]

Read Now
Webinar: Banned Books Week 2024

Webinar: Banned Books Week 2024

As book bans and academic censorship escalate across the United States, this free hour-long webinar gathers experts to discuss the impact these […]

Read Now
Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

The creation of the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) has led to a heated debate on the balance between peer review and evaluative metrics in research assessment regimes. Luciana Balboa, Elizabeth Gadd, Eva Mendez, Janne Pölönen, Karen Stroobants, Erzsebet Toth Cithra and the CoARA Steering Board address these arguments and state CoARA’s commitment to finding ways in which peer review and bibliometrics can be used together responsibly.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments