News

Research ethics blog back online

April 21, 2011 1329

Thanks for the comments on the first post.  I am sorry there has been a bit of a hiccup with this blog but there were some technical hitches and I was then on holiday for a couple of weeks.  I hope to contribute a bit more regularly from now on but today I am just going to respond to the comments rather than start new topics.

In a sense the two responses complement each other quite nicely.  Anon questions the analysis in terms of US hegemony but I think we have to ask where the fear of litigation comes from.  Does it apply equally in the Australian case cited or in Ireland, where I have been asked to speak in a couple of weeks’ time or throughout mainland Europe where the European Commission is pushing to introduce ethical regulation into countries that do not currently have it, beyond what is required for clinical trials. You can argue for a spill-over of the ‘compensation culture’ myth, which has as little empirical foundation in the UK as in the US, but then you are really talking about the hegemonic transmission of culture anyway.

Gillian notes the problems caused for her by the fact that her informants do not recognize the issues in the same way as her institution: her informants are going to be made modern citizens whether they want to be or not.  I had thought that Australia had moved beyond this in its treatment of First Nations people.  This reminds me of another case which I have written about, which I heard from a UK researcher who had begun an ethnography of a Japanese factory before his university introduced a REC system.  However, he wanted to do taped interviews at the end of the study and was told to get approval from the committee, who also demanded signed consent forms.  His Japanese informants found this grossly offensive because it implied a lack of trust when they had opened their factory to him for a year previously and given him free access to company personnel and data.  They agreed to co-operate out of goodwill towards him but the interviews were very formal in character, with minimal responses and yielding little useful data.  At the end, they asked him to terminate his research because they felt polluted by this demand that their trust be documented.

All ethnography rests on trust – it is a fragile foundation but that makes its everyday preservation the real and effective discipline of the researcher rather than the actions of some remote set of regulators.

Anthony – I will look at your paper if I can get online access.

Robert Dingwall is an emeritus professor of sociology at Nottingham Trent University. He also serves as a consulting sociologist, providing research and advisory services particularly in relation to organizational strategy, public engagement and knowledge transfer. He is co-editor of the SAGE Handbook of Research Management.

View all posts by Robert Dingwall

Related Articles

Alondra Nelson Named to U.S. National Science Board
Announcements
October 18, 2024

Alondra Nelson Named to U.S. National Science Board

Read Now
Exploring the ‘Publish or Perish’ Mentality and its Impact on Research Paper Retractions
Research
October 10, 2024

Exploring the ‘Publish or Perish’ Mentality and its Impact on Research Paper Retractions

Read Now
Lee Miller: Ethics, photography and ethnography
News
September 30, 2024

Lee Miller: Ethics, photography and ethnography

Read Now
‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land
International Debate
September 27, 2024

‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

Read Now
NSF Seeks Input on Research Ethics

NSF Seeks Input on Research Ethics

In a ‘Dear Colleague’ letter released September 9, the NSF issued a ‘request for information,’ or RFI, from those interested in research ethics.

Read Now
Artificial Intelligence and the Social and Behavioral Sciences

Artificial Intelligence and the Social and Behavioral Sciences

Intelligence would generally be reckoned as the province of the social and behavioral sciences, so why is artificial intelligence so often relegated […]

Read Now
Pandemic Nemesis: Illich reconsidered

Pandemic Nemesis: Illich reconsidered

An unexpected element of post-pandemic reflections has been the revival of interest in the work of Ivan Illich, a significant public intellectual […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments