Academic Funding

‘Dismantling excellence, reducing quality, and increasing costs for students’

June 29, 2011 4132

The Campaign for the Public University has posted a response to the UK Government’s White Paper on higher education, arguing that the Government has turned its back on the principle of higher education as a public good.

“The Government has turned its back on the public good that higher education provides and is planning to open it up for competition by for-profit providers.

“A public higher education system that is internationally acclaimed for its excellence is being dismantled because of ill-thought out proposals to make savings by removing the block grant and shifting the burden of costs onto students through higher fees. Now that it is evident that a system of loans that would mean that a degree was free at the point of purchase will be more costly than the system it was replacing, it plans market shock treatment.

“Government ’spin’ describes this as enhancing the student-consumer experience. Yet, the National Student Survey shows high levels of satisfaction of students with their courses across most programmes and universities. At the same time, there is a high degree of public support for public funding of universities. The current system of public universities offers an enhanced student experience; that is, an experience enhanced by good teaching by subject specialists within the context of a university community serving the public good not private profit…”

Read the full blog-post here.

Related Articles

Deciphering the Mystery of the Working-Class Voter: A View From Britain
Insights
November 14, 2024

Deciphering the Mystery of the Working-Class Voter: A View From Britain

Read Now
Julia Ebner on Violent Extremism
Insights
November 4, 2024

Julia Ebner on Violent Extremism

Read Now
Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do
International Debate
October 23, 2024

Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do

Read Now
All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture
Event
October 10, 2024

All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture

Read Now
‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

The term ‘settler colonialism’ was coined by an Australian historian in the 1960s to describe the occupation of a territory with a […]

Read Now
Webinar: Banned Books Week 2024

Webinar: Banned Books Week 2024

As book bans and academic censorship escalate across the United States, this free hour-long webinar gathers experts to discuss the impact these […]

Read Now
Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

The creation of the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) has led to a heated debate on the balance between peer review and evaluative metrics in research assessment regimes. Luciana Balboa, Elizabeth Gadd, Eva Mendez, Janne Pölönen, Karen Stroobants, Erzsebet Toth Cithra and the CoARA Steering Board address these arguments and state CoARA’s commitment to finding ways in which peer review and bibliometrics can be used together responsibly.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments