Featured

On ‘Jeopardy!’ women take fewer risks vs. men

June 27, 2011 1185

Tom Jacobs writes in Miller-McCune Magazine about a study of contestant behavior on a game show that suggests women tend to hedge their bets when facing male opponents.

The answer is: It’s a game show that provides surprising clues about sex, social rules and risk-taking.

And the question is: What is Jeopardy!?

Two Swedish researchers, writing in the journal Economics Letters, report an intriguing pattern of behavior by contestants on the popular quiz program. Women, it seems, take fewer risks when their Jeopardy! opponents are men.

Gabriella Sjogren Lindquist and Jenny Save-Soderbergh of the Swedish Institute for Social Research looked at 206 episodes of Jeopardy!, focusing on those moments when one of the three contestants must decide how much to wage on a Daily Double.

For those unfamiliar with the Jeopardy!, Daily Doubles pop up at random during the course of play. Rather than wagering a set amount on whether they will know the answer to a question (the show’s usual format), contestants are given the opportunity to bet as much or as little as they like, up to the amount of money they have accumulated to that point.

The researchers tallied the results of 615 Daily Doubles, featuring 251 male and 65 female contestants. (The same contestant can play several Daily Doubles during the course of the show, and still more if he or she wins and returns the next day.)

The researchers found “no systemic gender differences in performance,” either on the Daily Double questions or the final scores. But they also determined that “male players are more likely to give the correct answer when competing against males only.” Perhaps man-to-man competition, which played a vital role in our evolutionary past, sharpens the male mind…

Click here to read the article in its entirety.

One of Library Journal’s Best Magazines of 2008, Miller-McCune not only identifies policy issues of global important but provides evidence-based solutions offered by academic research and real-world models. Through excellent but understandable writing and proven judgment in what to cover, the nonprofit Miller-McCune has received a surprising amount of acclaim and, more importantly, a large and growing audience interested in the social and natural sciences.

View all posts by Pacific-Standard Magazine

Related Articles

The Mystery of Xenotransplantation for Social Sciences
Innovation
February 27, 2025

The Mystery of Xenotransplantation for Social Sciences

Read Now
NOMIS & Science Young Explorer Award: Now Accepting Applications
Recognition
February 20, 2025

NOMIS & Science Young Explorer Award: Now Accepting Applications

Read Now
What Does RFK’s Confirmation Tell Us About the US and Health Care?
Public Policy
February 16, 2025

What Does RFK’s Confirmation Tell Us About the US and Health Care?

Read Now
Tracking Current Federal Changes Affecting U.S. Education and Science
Resources
February 13, 2025

Tracking Current Federal Changes Affecting U.S. Education and Science

Read Now
Social Science for Social Justice Podcast Returns for Second Season 

Social Science for Social Justice Podcast Returns for Second Season 

Sage (the parent of Social Science Space) and Surviving Society’s collaborative podcast series, Social Science for Social Justice, has returned for a […]

Read Now
Taking Stock of the Biden Administration’s Approach to Science Policy

Taking Stock of the Biden Administration’s Approach to Science Policy

President Joe Biden was inaugurated in January 2021 amid a devastating pandemic, with over 24 million COVID-19 cases and more than 400,000 […]

Read Now
Should the USA Pull Out of the World Health Organization?

Should the USA Pull Out of the World Health Organization?

It is widely reported that one of the first acts of the incoming Trump administration will be to withdraw from the World […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments