Audio

All out war: media coverage of for-profit higher education

July 27, 2011 1037

Tim Gramling’s study, “All Out War: Media Coverage of For-Profit Education,” recently published in SAGE Open, systematically charts the frequency and intensity of stories about for-profits in the news since Barack Obama’s election in November 2008. Focusing on how the U.S. government and for-profits themselves drove this coverage, Gramling describes how this divide both facilitates information exchange, and employs personalization and fragmentation.

Learn more about by listening to an interview with the author or reading the full text of the article.

Sage

Sage, the parent of Social Science Space, is a global academic publisher of books, journals, and library resources with a growing range of technologies to enable discovery, access, and engagement. Believing that research and education are critical in shaping society, 24-year-old Sara Miller McCune founded Sage in 1965. Today, we are controlled by a group of trustees charged with maintaining our independence and mission indefinitely. 

View all posts by Sage

Published

July 27, 2011

The Conversation Podcast Series Examines Class in British Politics

By Laura Hood

Read Now

Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do

Communication

October 23, 2024

Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do

By Spencer Kimball, Camille Mumford and Matt Taglia

Read Now

All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture

Event

October 10, 2024

All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture

By Sage

Read Now

‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

International Debate

September 27, 2024

‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

By Robert Dingwall

Read Now

Webinar: Banned Books Week 2024

Sage 737 Event, International Debate

As book bans and academic censorship escalate across the United States, this free hour-long webinar gathers experts to discuss the impact these […]

Read Now

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

Luciana Balboa, Elizabeth Gadd, Eva Mendez, Janne Pölönen, Karen Stroobants, Erzsebet Toth Cithra and the CoARA Steering Board 766 Impact, International Debate, Opinion

The creation of the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) has led to a heated debate on the balance between peer review and evaluative metrics in research assessment regimes. Luciana Balboa, Elizabeth Gadd, Eva Mendez, Janne Pölönen, Karen Stroobants, Erzsebet Toth Cithra and the CoARA Steering Board address these arguments and state CoARA’s commitment to finding ways in which peer review and bibliometrics can be used together responsibly.

Read Now

Revisiting the ‘Research Parasite’ Debate in the Age of AI

C. Brandon Ogbunu 2125 Communication, Industry, International Debate

The large language models, or LLMs, that underlie generative AI tools such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT, have an ethical challenge in how they parasitize freely available data.

Read Now