Business and Management INK

Customer Satisfaction: Priorities for Improvement

May 10, 2012 1391

Marketing expert Donald R. Bacon, Professor in the Daniels College of Business at the University of Denver and editor of the Journal of Marketing Education, has a new article that introduces a method for identifying priorities in order to achieve greater overall customer satisfaction.

Understanding Priorities for Service Attribute Improvement” was published in the May 2012 issue of the Journal of Service Research. To view other articles in this issue, please click here.

Dr. Bacon writes in the executive summary:

In today’s increasingly competitive environment, service managers continually look for ways to improve their services. They generally know that some improvements will have more impact on customer satisfaction than others, but with limited budgets, identifying the specific improvements with the greatest impact is critical. This paper offers managers a new tool to understand which improvements to their services will give the biggest boost to customer satisfaction with the service.

The task of identifying the attributes with the greatest impact is particularly challenging because customers may not care that much about further improvement in some attributes. Thus, the attributes that were top priorities for improvement last year may not be top priorities this year because they have reached a point of diminishing returns. Several methods exist for understanding how customers value additional improvements in a service attribute, such as importance-performance analysis (IPA), regression analysis, and factor regression. However, these techniques have important limitations that are discussed in this article.

This paper introduces marginal utility analysis (MUA), a new method of understanding the relationship between an attribute and the overall customer evaluation of a service. The data necessary for the method can be collected within a typical customer satisfaction survey. With these data, the method estimates the shape of the relationship between each attribute and the overall evaluation of the service. Other techniques assume the same functional form between the attribute and the overall evaluation. MUA does not force an attribute to assume the same general form. Consequently, MUA provides a more accurate and detailed picture of each attribute’s relationship to the overall evaluation. Based on Item Response Theory and Rasch analysis, MUA is entirely different than factor and regression analyses and brings a new and richer perspective to understanding customers’ evaluation of service performance.

MUA is demonstrated using customer satisfaction data collected by a medical professional association following their annual conference. The method displays the results graphically and provides managers with a helpful visual tool for identifying the attributes that are top priorities for improvement now, and those that may become top priorities in the future as conditions change. For example, at low levels of satisfaction, customers value reducing the crowding at the conference more than increasing the amount of continuing education credit available. However, at higher levels of satisfaction, the priorities are reversed; reducing the crowding further is not as valued as increasing the educational opportunities. The method’s output is easy to interpret and should generate insightful conversations among the full management team.

Read the full article here. To learn more about the Journal of Service Research, please click here.

Are you interested in receiving email alerts whenever a new article or issue becomes available? Then follow this link!

Business and Management INK puts the spotlight on research published in our more than 100 management and business journals. We feature an inside view of the research that’s being published in top-tier SAGE journals by the authors themselves.

View all posts by Business & Management INK

Related Articles

Author Reflections on Intraorganizational Developmental Networks
Business and Management INK
April 2, 2025

Author Reflections on Intraorganizational Developmental Networks

Read Now
Changing the World or Changing Ourselves?
Business and Management INK
March 12, 2025

Changing the World or Changing Ourselves?

Read Now
Generative AI Literacy: A Proposed Way Forward
Business and Management INK
March 11, 2025

Generative AI Literacy: A Proposed Way Forward

Read Now
Exploring the Psychosocial Correlation of Skin Lightening Products
Business and Management INK
February 10, 2025

Exploring the Psychosocial Correlation of Skin Lightening Products

Read Now
Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on the European Union Emission Trading Scheme

Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on the European Union Emission Trading Scheme

In this article, co-authors Abhinava Tripathi, Charu Vadhava, and Ravi Raushan Jha reflect on the inspiration behind their research article, “Pricing efficiency of European carbon […]

Read Now
Navigating CSR Communication in an Age of Polarization

Navigating CSR Communication in an Age of Polarization

In this article, authors Dennis Schoeneborn, Urša Golob, Hannah Trittin-Ulbrich, Matthias Wenzel, and Amy O’Connor reflect on the inspiration behind their research article, “CSR Communication and […]

Read Now
What European SMEs Can Teach Us About Innovation and Informal Human Resource Management

What European SMEs Can Teach Us About Innovation and Informal Human Resource Management

In this article, co-authors Desiree Meurs, Marise Born, Yolanda Grift, Maaike Lycklama à Nijeholt, and Joop Schippers offer a sneak peek into the inspiration […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments