Business and Management INK

How Thinking Styles Influence Team Innovation

September 6, 2012 1366

Dr. Corinne Post, Lehigh University

Editor’s note: We are pleased to welcome Dr. Corinne Post, Assistant Professor of Management at Lehigh University. Dr. Post, whose research interests include diversity management, performance, and innovation, published “Deep-Level Team Composition and Innovation: The Mediating Roles of Psychological Safety and Cooperative Learning” on August 30, 2012 in Group & Organization Management.

***

There has been a lot of attention on how the diversity of knowledge held among team members may influence a team’s capacity to innovate. I argue that the way team members think—that is, the ways in which they process information—also influence a team’s ability to innovate (above and beyond the variety of knowledge held by team members.)

Findings from a National Science Foundation (NSF) supported study, using a sample of 83 natural innovation teams, support my argument. The results of the study, to be published in Group & Organization Management later this year, show that thinking styles indirectly influence team innovation by shaping teams’ interpersonal dynamics. Sequential, analytical thinking decreases team innovation by inhibiting psychological safety, while holistic, connective thinking improves team innovation by facilitating cooperative learning among members.

The findings from this study are especially noteworthy because they show that the relationship between team members’ cognitive styles and team innovation is independent from the relationship between knowledge variety and innovation. Hence, thinking styles should be considered an important area of investigation, distinct from the work on informational diversity, in further efforts to unpack the team composition / team performance puzzle.

Managers, who are often encouraged to compose teams with diverse task-relevant experts in order to put knowledge diversity at the service of innovation, should also consider members’ thinking styles when putting together innovation teams because the pooled cognitive styles of members appear to influence team innovation above and beyond the functional variety represented by team members.

Follow this link to read Dr. Post’s article in Group & Organization Management. Would you like to keep up with the latest research on this topic? Click here to sign up for customizable e-alerts!

 

Business and Management INK puts the spotlight on research published in our more than 100 management and business journals. We feature an inside view of the research that’s being published in top-tier SAGE journals by the authors themselves.

View all posts by Business & Management INK

Related Articles

From Isolation to Impact: Tackling the Emotional Toll of Ethnographic Research in Business and Society
Business and Management INK
April 22, 2025

From Isolation to Impact: Tackling the Emotional Toll of Ethnographic Research in Business and Society

Read Now
Ready to Tackle Global Challenges? Apply to Attend Dubai Showcase
Infrastructure
April 17, 2025

Ready to Tackle Global Challenges? Apply to Attend Dubai Showcase

Read Now
“Everything Not Saved Will Be Lost.” –Nintendo “Quit Screen” Message
Business and Management INK
April 8, 2025

“Everything Not Saved Will Be Lost.” –Nintendo “Quit Screen” Message

Read Now
Author Reflections on Intraorganizational Developmental Networks
Business and Management INK
April 2, 2025

Author Reflections on Intraorganizational Developmental Networks

Read Now
Long-Term Impact Requires Archiving Research Communication

Long-Term Impact Requires Archiving Research Communication

In recent years there has been an increased focus on how research papers and supplemental data can be preserved openly. Andy Tattersall, Liz Such, Joe Langley and Fiona Marshall argue equal attention should also be paid to curating communication outputs aimed at engaging non-academic audiences.

Read Now
Changing the World or Changing Ourselves?

Changing the World or Changing Ourselves?

In this blog post, co-authors Catherine Brentnall and David Higgins reflect on their interest in how educators change themselves and their practice […]

Read Now
Generative AI Literacy: A Proposed Way Forward

Generative AI Literacy: A Proposed Way Forward

In this article, co-authors Stefanie Beninger, Alex Reppel, Julie Stanton and Forrest Watson reflect on the inspiration behind their research article, “Facilitating Generative AI […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments