International Debate

Robert Cialdini Explains: How Can Social Science Inform Policy?

November 22, 2013 1057

Cialdini EventOn November 12, 2013, Dr. Robert Cialdini, Dr. Arthur Lupia, representatives from 16 current congressional offices, two former Members of Congress, and representatives from 21 academic and social and behavioral science organizations met for a lively discussion on Capitol Hill on how psychology can be used to inform government policy. The event was organized by the Division of Behavioral and Social Science and Education, one of the five divisions of the National Research Council, as part of their important initiative “Social and Behavioral Sciences in Action.”

Renowned psychology scholar and bestselling author Robert Cialdini gave a presentation that explained the social factors that lead to behavior change. His six universal principles of social influence – including reciprocation, scarcity, authority, friendship/liking, commitment/consistency, and consensus, can be (and have been) successfully applied to new policy as it is implemented publicly. Dr. Cialdini provided several compelling and even surprising examples (see slides above) such as implementing new health care, energy, and power policy.

Dr. Cialdini’s presentation was followed up by remarks made by former Representatives Brian Baird (D-WA) and Nancy Johnson (R-CT) who acknowledged the invaluable insight offered by social and behavioral scientists for policy and successful persuasion in general. Following these remarks, political scientist Arthur Lupia led a question-and-answer session for the 19 congressional staff in attendance about how they can apply these important findings in their work.

“What does social science tell us about how policy should be improved? It’s not just common sense. Common sense often sends you the opposite direction,” stated Representative Baird. “The surprising findings from the social sciences, by contrast, save time and money.”

To find out more about this SAGE-sponsored event, please click here.


Sage, the parent of Social Science Space, is a global academic publisher of books, journals, and library resources with a growing range of technologies to enable discovery, access, and engagement. Believing that research and education are critical in shaping society, 24-year-old Sara Miller McCune founded Sage in 1965. Today, we are controlled by a group of trustees charged with maintaining our independence and mission indefinitely. 

View all posts by Sage

Related Articles

Deciphering the Mystery of the Working-Class Voter: A View From Britain
Insights
November 14, 2024

Deciphering the Mystery of the Working-Class Voter: A View From Britain

Read Now
Julia Ebner on Violent Extremism
Insights
November 4, 2024

Julia Ebner on Violent Extremism

Read Now
Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do
International Debate
October 23, 2024

Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do

Read Now
All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture
Event
October 10, 2024

All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture

Read Now
‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

The term ‘settler colonialism’ was coined by an Australian historian in the 1960s to describe the occupation of a territory with a […]

Read Now
Webinar: Banned Books Week 2024

Webinar: Banned Books Week 2024

As book bans and academic censorship escalate across the United States, this free hour-long webinar gathers experts to discuss the impact these […]

Read Now
Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

The creation of the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) has led to a heated debate on the balance between peer review and evaluative metrics in research assessment regimes. Luciana Balboa, Elizabeth Gadd, Eva Mendez, Janne Pölönen, Karen Stroobants, Erzsebet Toth Cithra and the CoARA Steering Board address these arguments and state CoARA’s commitment to finding ways in which peer review and bibliometrics can be used together responsibly.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Donna

I am looking for other Mental Health settings that have incorporated Cialdini’s Principles.