Career

Leveling the Career Playing Field … with Audio

September 3, 2014 2064

I’m a PhD researcher and an aspiring academic. Like many involved in social science research, I’ve incrementally built up an online presence. Sites include Linkedin, Academia.edu, my University of Manchester profile page and a Twitter account that I regularly forget to update and am often bewildered about what to tweet (see Salma Patels’ 2012 blog post about social media sites for academics). A few friends have profiles on ResearchGate or have set up personal blogs on WordPress, so there are always these options waiting in the virtual wings for me. So you might think that the ‘academic social media market’ has become entirely saturated and that there couldn’t possibly be room for more. Alas not, and please allow me to tell you why I decided to create Viva Voce, which allows researchers to podcast their research.

LSE Impact logo

This article by Gemma Sou originally appeared on the LSE Impact of Social Sciences blog as “Podcasts can ‘level the playing field’ for researchers looking to break the mould and share accessible findings” and is reposted under the Creative Commons license (CC BY 3.0).

First, online Goliaths such as Linkedin and academia.edu are excellent for researchers to extensively document their research and achievements. However, they are in effect, virtual CVs that encourage researchers to list all of their publications, experience, skills and the kitchen sink. This has great appeal and utility, particularly for potential employers wanting to supplement a job applicant’s interview. However, it effectively mirrors the academic environment, which rewards researchers with a longer list of publications. This marginalizes early career researchers with naturally fewer publications and experience and also steers attention away from innovative research that may not have produced many articles, books chapters or conference papers as of yet.


Viva Voce podcasts logo

More on Viva Voce

Viva Voce Podcasts: What You Do, Not What You’ve Done – Social Sciecne Space interviews Gemma Sou as Viva Voce debuts
Defining Policy: Climate Change Governmental Policy in Africa – An an article accompanying his own podcast, Simon Chin-Yee describes his research studying how the political network in Kenya interacts with the changes wrought by climate change


A second reason is because networking on these sites (with the exception of Twitter) is predominantly based upon who you know (or ‘May Know’ according to Linkedin), who you have met or who you have worked with. Again, this marginalizes researchers with a smaller network and does not use the topic of research as the conduit for networking or increasing the amount of people that are exposed to your research. The third reason is because these sites are text heavy and not very accessible or exciting. The result is that research is being cocooned inside academia and beyond the interest of the general public.

In a very humble bid to address this, I started to play around with wix.com as a fool proof web design platform. I showed friends and my PhD supervisors the beginnings of Viva Voce, and they all gave it the ‘thumbs up’. This kick started a megalomaniac mission to develop it further and beyond my academic department. I tentatively launched the site on June 21 2014 and have since gained a partnership with Social Science Space – SAGE Publications in California, been awarded the University of Manchester Social Enterprise ‘Do It’ Award and an unexpected and very belated love of Twitter.

In a nutshell, Viva Voce allows social science researchers to set up a sub 5 minute podcast about their research and experience that is accessible to a non-specialist audience. It’s designed as a platform for ‘researcher equality’ because the ‘playing field’ is leveled to a podcast and a short profile, with direct links to up to two of your publications, personal websites, Twitter ID, and e-mail. As such, the podcast is the ‘taster’ that encourages people to click on the accompanying links and learn more about you and your research. Each user profile is visible on three keyword pages and a discipline page, which gives greater exposure for the researcher, encourages interdisciplinarity and ensures that the topic of your research is at the heart of your profile.

In the beginning I relied on bombarding friends with e-mails and not so subliminal comments to get them to record themselves. Now I’ve started to receive submissions from people in other Universities and who heard about Viva Voce through means besides my ‘bullying’. Last month 1600 people visited the site. This is really encouraging and I love hearing about the diverse research that is taking place. Only yesterday I listened to the latest submission about facial transplants and how this affects a person’s sense of identity.

At this stage I’m trying to raise finance to pay a professional web designer to improve user utility. The most important feature is for users to be able to sign up and edit their profiles as and when they like (I’m currently formatting them myself which is very time consuming). Other features include: a messenger service for users; an advanced search tool; and the ability to like and share individual podcasts. I’ve raised £2,000; however, there is approximately £4,000 more to go. In a bid to chip away at this I started a Kickstarter fund and will apply for a ‘Knowledge Exchange Impact Acceleration Account’. I’ve contacted several well-known research councils, but they are unable to financially support Viva Voce as I’m a student (can you hear the tiny violin?).

I’m extremely optimistic about the use of podcasts because academia is a slow ‘industry’ and often only a few people hear about your work. With a podcast the focus is on your research topic and you can quickly share your results. Findings are also made more accessible and engaging for people outside of the academic bubble, and who are often directly applicable to the results. In addition, social science research can become sanitized when researchers are left to summarize their findings in a few lines. By literally giving researchers a voice, findings become more exciting as people are allowed to animate their findings and bring character to their research, which I think does more justice to the research that they carry out.

The following podcasts are examples from the Viva Voce platform.


Jason Luger: Creative Singapore: Paradoxes and Possibilities (The Geographies of Cultural Activism in an Authoritarian City-State)

Human Geography, King’s College London and the National University of Singapore (jointly)

Keywords: Activism, Artists,Comparative urbanism


Helen Underhill: Political Learning in the Struggle: A study of Egypt’s Diaspora

IDPM, University of Manchester

Keywords: Diaspora; Egypt;Political Learning


Anna Laing: Territories in Resistance: Struggling Towards the Plurinational State of Bolivia

Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow

Keywords: Bolivia, Indigeneity, Politics


Gemma Sou is a final year PhD researcher at the Institute for Development Policy and Management at the University of Manchester. Her research interest lie in the relationship between media, communication and development; representations of the global South; disaster risk management in the urban South and the relationship between risk perceptions and human behavior.

View all posts by Gemma Sou

Related Articles

Canada’s Storytellers Challenge Seeks Compelling Narratives About Student Research
Communication
November 21, 2024

Canada’s Storytellers Challenge Seeks Compelling Narratives About Student Research

Read Now
Ninth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: Tackling the Gender Pay Gap 
Communication
October 31, 2024

Ninth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: Tackling the Gender Pay Gap 

Read Now
The Conversation Podcast Series Examines Class in British Politics
Communication
October 25, 2024

The Conversation Podcast Series Examines Class in British Politics

Read Now
Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do
International Debate
October 23, 2024

Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do

Read Now
Diving Into OSTP’s ‘Blueprint’ for Using Social and Behavioral Science in Policy

Diving Into OSTP’s ‘Blueprint’ for Using Social and Behavioral Science in Policy

Just in time for this past summer’s reading list, in May 2024 the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (technically, […]

Read Now
Eighth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: How Sexist Abuse Undermines Political Representation 

Eighth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: How Sexist Abuse Undermines Political Representation 

In this month’s issue of The Evidence newsletter, Josephine Lethbridge explores rising levels of abuse directed towards women in politics, spotlighting research […]

Read Now
Revisiting the ‘Research Parasite’ Debate in the Age of AI

Revisiting the ‘Research Parasite’ Debate in the Age of AI

The large language models, or LLMs, that underlie generative AI tools such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT, have an ethical challenge in how they parasitize freely available data.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments