Bookshelf

Book Review: The American Non-Dilemma: Racial Inequality without Racism

October 3, 2014 1478

51pmw4BPGfL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_The weather is getting cooler and it’s the perfect time to cozy up with a good book.

Nancy DiTomaso : The American Non-Dilemma: Racial Inequality without Racism. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2013. 432 pp. $42.50, paper.

You can read Standford University Professor Brian Lowery’s review from Administrative Science Quarterly‘s OnlineFirst section:

When I was in college, an organization of primarily young white men would periodically hold a bake sale. The point of these sales wasn’t to raise funds but to call attention to what the group saw as discrimination against whites on college campuses. The prices for their baked goods were meant to reflect this racial inequality. While I don’t remember the exact prices, here is an ASQ_v59n3_Sept2014_cover.inddapproximation: whites = $1.00, Asians = $.50, blacks and Latinos = free. I doubt they sold many cookies, but they did express their belief that whites were unfairly treated on college campuses. While most of their dismay was directed toward affirmative action policies, in my short conversations with members of this group, their concerns were not limited to affirmative action. They thought ethnic minorities were getting special treatment while whites were getting the short end of the stick. By just about any objective measure, whites were better off than most ethnic minorities. But not only did these racial inequalities not cause these particular whites moral angst, they also felt that whites were aggrieved.

DiTomaso’s book suggests that the lack of concern about ethnic minorities’ disadvantages, which allows for events like the bake sale, is commonplace. Whites are surprisingly unconcerned about racial inequality, at least when understood as minority disadvantage. She suggests that whites are not bothered by racial inequality because they do not believe they contribute to its existence. The vast majority of whites believe that racism is wrong—that people shouldn’t be mistreated simply because of their ethnic backgrounds. Unless they see themselves as racist, this belief allows whites to see themselves as blameless. DiTomaso does not share this perspective. She proposes that even if no whites are racist, it would be an error to conclude that whites do not contribute to racial inequality.

Click here to read the rest of the review from Administrative Science Quarterly. Like what you read? Sign up from e-alerts for all the latest news and research from Administrative Science Quarterly!

Business and Management INK puts the spotlight on research published in our more than 100 management and business journals. We feature an inside view of the research that’s being published in top-tier SAGE journals by the authors themselves.

View all posts by Business & Management INK

Related Articles

The End of the Free Trade Era?
Bookshelf
April 8, 2025

The End of the Free Trade Era?

Read Now
Yes, Cities Can Be Sexist 
Bookshelf
April 1, 2025

Yes, Cities Can Be Sexist 

Read Now
What Can We Learn From The Women Of The Iron Age? 
Bookshelf
March 5, 2025

What Can We Learn From The Women Of The Iron Age? 

Read Now
AI is Here, But Is It Here to Help Us or Replace Us?
Bookshelf
February 11, 2025

AI is Here, But Is It Here to Help Us or Replace Us?

Read Now
How Research Credibility Suffers in a Quantified Society

How Research Credibility Suffers in a Quantified Society

To address research credibility issues, we must reform the role of metrics, rankings, and incentives in universities.

Read Now
Eleventh Edition of The Evidence: Why Don’t CPR Dummies Have Breasts? 

Eleventh Edition of The Evidence: Why Don’t CPR Dummies Have Breasts? 

In this month’s issue of The Evidence newsletter, Josephine Lethbridge examines the overlooked gender bias in CPR training equipment.  While attending mandatory […]

Read Now
NAS Report Examines Nexus of AI and Workplace

NAS Report Examines Nexus of AI and Workplace

A 2024 report by the National Academies explores the latest advances in artificial intelligence (AI) technology and their potential effects on economic productivity, job stability, and income inequality. It also highlights key research opportunities and data needs to help workers and policymakers adapt to the evolving AI landscape.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments