International Debate

Academy Looks at Implications of EU Referendum

June 16, 2016 1130

AfSS_briefing_cover_opt

Click image to see full report.

Britain’s Academy of Social Sciences has published a professional briefing on the implications of the EU referendum for UK social science, ahead of the vote on the UK’s membership in the EU on June 23.

The paper analyses the relationship between UK social science and the European Union in the context of the debate about the future development of research after the referendum. It concludes that, given the available evidence, compared to other sciences in the UK and to social scientists in other EU member states, over the past two decades UK social scientists may have benefited to a greater extent from the EU funding and capacity building opportunities provided by EU programs.

The paper found that, while UK research council and government funding for the life sciences has been rising consistently since 2000 and has remained relatively constant in engineering and physical sciences, UK government and research council funding for social science has been declining since peaking in 2004 for government funding, and in 2009 for research council funding. In contrast, since 2006, the volume of EU funding for social sciences has been increasing more rapidly than in the life sciences, bringing the ‘EU government’ contribution close to that received from the UK government, and to more than half the amount awarded by UK research councils.

Within the European context, the paper also found that UK universities have benefited not only from the financial resources obtained from the EU, but also from the mobility of staff and students within the EU. Analysis by the Higher Education Statistics Agency for 2013–2014 from REF 2014 data shows that 15 percent of academic staff in UK Higher Education are non-British EU nationals, rising to 16 percent across the social sciences, and higher still for humanities and languages, and for sciences and maths, both with 21 percent. HESA data for the LSE showed that, while the largest ‘nationality group’ of research staff from 2004-2005 was from the UK, by 2014-2015 that had shifted to staff from the EU.

Evidence assembled in the paper confirms that, when compared to researchers in other disciplines in the UK and to social scientists in most other EU member states, UK social scientists have benefited to a greater extent from EU funding and from EU support for capacity building and networking activities. The performance of social scientists has been particularly creditable in obtaining European Research Council grants awarded for research excellence.


The Academy of Social Science’s mission is to promote social sciences in the United Kingdom for the public benefit. The academy is composed of individual academicians and learned societies; it responds to government and other consultations on behalf of the social science community, organizes meetings about social science and seminars on topics that span social science disciplines, and sponsors a number of efforts that promote social science and enhance its value to society.

View all posts by Academy of Social Sciences

Related Articles

Julia Ebner on Violent Extremism
Insights
November 4, 2024

Julia Ebner on Violent Extremism

Read Now
Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do
Communication
October 23, 2024

Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do

Read Now
All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture
Event
October 10, 2024

All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture

Read Now
‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land
International Debate
September 27, 2024

‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

Read Now
Webinar: Banned Books Week 2024

Webinar: Banned Books Week 2024

As book bans and academic censorship escalate across the United States, this free hour-long webinar gathers experts to discuss the impact these […]

Read Now
Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

The creation of the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) has led to a heated debate on the balance between peer review and evaluative metrics in research assessment regimes. Luciana Balboa, Elizabeth Gadd, Eva Mendez, Janne Pölönen, Karen Stroobants, Erzsebet Toth Cithra and the CoARA Steering Board address these arguments and state CoARA’s commitment to finding ways in which peer review and bibliometrics can be used together responsibly.

Read Now
Revisiting the ‘Research Parasite’ Debate in the Age of AI

Revisiting the ‘Research Parasite’ Debate in the Age of AI

The large language models, or LLMs, that underlie generative AI tools such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT, have an ethical challenge in how they parasitize freely available data.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments