Announcements

March for Science II Set for This Saturday Announcements
Some of the official posters that will join thousands of homemade efforts at this year's March for Science

March for Science II Set for This Saturday

April 11, 2018 2667

Science Posters

Some of the official posters that will join thousands of homemade efforts at this year’s March for Science

On April 22, 2017, the world saw the first-ever global effort to lobby for science – the March for Science. More than a million people in 600 different locations across the world demonstrated for solid science and evidence-based policy.

Last year’s March for Science originated on social media with fears brought about by changes to science policy and science budgets that followed the swearing in a new U.S. president.  A disdain for climate science and a stated intent to dismantle many environmental regulations activated marchers, as did, to a smaller extent, the continuing drumbeat to reduce federal funding for social science research.

In the year since, the back and forth between science, government and the shaping of policy sustained the momentum for a second march, which takes place this Saturday. As Maggie Villiger, the science editor of U.S. version of The Conversation wrote in December, “Scientists felt under siege as the Trump administration purged information from government websites, appointed inexperienced or adversarial individuals to science-related posts and left important advisory positions empty. Researchers braced for cuts to federally funded science.”

And while actions by the likes of Environmental Protection Agency head Scott Pruitt and House Science Committee Chairman Lama Smith still set many scientists’ teeth on edge, 2018 was not all bad news. Despite major cuts sought in the administration’s budget proposal for many science agencies, the actual federal budget for the current fiscal year increased science research funding substantially – even dramatically at the National Institutes of Health.

Against this backdrop the second march is planned, a grassroots effort that really took root. “We do not merely react to the problems of today,” the march’s website insists. “We look forward, aspiring toward an inclusive, integrated vision for the future of science and science policy.” The organization behind this year’s march wants to be clear that this public event is open to all and not an attack any one person or political affiliation. “This isn’t about any one politician — this is about science and policy, scientists and science supporters,” the group’s website states. Which isn’t to say individuals aren’t scrutinized: The goal being to “hold leaders accountable for ‘developing and enacting evidence-based policy.’”

While there will be at least 230 satellite marches around the world this year, the main March for Science will again take place in Washington, D.C. It takes place on Saturday, April 14 (and not on Earth Day, as it did in 2017.) on 15th Street NW between Constitution and Independence avenues. Expo booths will be open all day, starting at 9 a.m., on the National Mall, along with letter writing tables and voter registration. Teach-in tents hosted by The Nature Conservancy, AAAS, the American Chemical Society, the Optical Society, and the Government Accountability Project will be open, too.

A rally hosted by Justin Shaifer, executive director of Fascinate Inc., and Wendy Zukerman, host of Science Vs., starts at noon. The rally features an eclectic mix of speakers like retired Navy admiral David Titley, Mari “Little Miss Flint” Copeny, Harvard’s Sheila Jasanoff, and Florida Institute of Technology’s Hakeem Oluseyi. The marching part of the March start at 2:30 p.m., and will be livestreamed.

If you would like to attend the Washington march, in other satellite cities around the world, or in the digital march, please RSVP here.


Philip Patino works for the Social Sciences and PR department at SAGE Publishing. He is responsible for editing, managing and writing for the SAGE sites Social Science Space and Methods Space. With already two degrees in Environmental Science Resource Management and Communication Marketing, from CSU Channel Islands, he plans on continuing his education by obtaining a Masters degree.

View all posts by Philip Patino

Related Articles

Julia Ebner on Violent Extremism
Insights
November 4, 2024

Julia Ebner on Violent Extremism

Read Now
Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do
Communication
October 23, 2024

Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do

Read Now
Alondra Nelson Named to U.S. National Science Board
Announcements
October 18, 2024

Alondra Nelson Named to U.S. National Science Board

Read Now
All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture
Event
October 10, 2024

All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture

Read Now
‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

The term ‘settler colonialism’ was coined by an Australian historian in the 1960s to describe the occupation of a territory with a […]

Read Now
Webinar: Banned Books Week 2024

Webinar: Banned Books Week 2024

As book bans and academic censorship escalate across the United States, this free hour-long webinar gathers experts to discuss the impact these […]

Read Now
Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

The creation of the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) has led to a heated debate on the balance between peer review and evaluative metrics in research assessment regimes. Luciana Balboa, Elizabeth Gadd, Eva Mendez, Janne Pölönen, Karen Stroobants, Erzsebet Toth Cithra and the CoARA Steering Board address these arguments and state CoARA’s commitment to finding ways in which peer review and bibliometrics can be used together responsibly.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments