Impact

The Value of Big Data Creation

May 12, 2018 1522

How do firms transform big data in order to create value? Why do firms differ in their abilities to create value from big data? These questions continued popping up for researchers Jing Zeng and Keith Glaister as they learned more and more about organizational data analysis. Just like census work or analytics of the past, today’s big data analysis seeks to gather intelligence from data and translate that via research into benefits for the organization. And unlike the past, key characteristics mean that the latest analysis of big data is more powerful than the analytics that were formerly used.

By using the questions asked above as templates to conduct research, their study – which appears in Strategic Organization — investigates how managers create value from big data.

“Drawing on qualitative data, ” they write in  “Value creation from big data: Looking inside the black box,” “we observe that firms differ in their abilities to extract value from big data, both internally within the firm and externally across the extended data-sharing network.”

“It is not the data itself, or individual data scientists, that generate value creation opportunities,” they write. “Rather, value creation occurs through the process of data management, where managers are able to democratize, contextualize, experiment and execute data insights in a timely manner.”

Jing (Maggie) Zeng holds a PhD from Newcastle University and has previously worked as a project adviser for small enterprises. She currently teaches business strategy for internet platform companies, Operations Management for Industry 4.0 & Big Data. Keith Glaister is a leading researcher in the field of international strategic management; he has published five books and over 80 articles in leading journals. As a professor, he has taught both in the UK and North America.

The entire article is available for free on SAGE Insight.


Sage, the parent of Social Science Space, is a global academic publisher of books, journals, and library resources with a growing range of technologies to enable discovery, access, and engagement. Believing that research and education are critical in shaping society, 24-year-old Sara Miller McCune founded Sage in 1965. Today, we are controlled by a group of trustees charged with maintaining our independence and mission indefinitely. 

View all posts by Sage

Related Articles

Ninth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: Tackling the Gender Pay Gap 
Communication
October 31, 2024

Ninth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: Tackling the Gender Pay Gap 

Read Now
The Conversation Podcast Series Examines Class in British Politics
Communication
October 25, 2024

The Conversation Podcast Series Examines Class in British Politics

Read Now
Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do
Communication
October 23, 2024

Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do

Read Now
Diving Into OSTP’s ‘Blueprint’ for Using Social and Behavioral Science in Policy
Bookshelf
October 14, 2024

Diving Into OSTP’s ‘Blueprint’ for Using Social and Behavioral Science in Policy

Read Now
Exploring the ‘Publish or Perish’ Mentality and its Impact on Research Paper Retractions

Exploring the ‘Publish or Perish’ Mentality and its Impact on Research Paper Retractions

When scientists make important discoveries, both big and small, they typically publish their findings in scientific journals for others to read. This […]

Read Now
Eighth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: How Sexist Abuse Undermines Political Representation 

Eighth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: How Sexist Abuse Undermines Political Representation 

In this month’s issue of The Evidence newsletter, Josephine Lethbridge explores rising levels of abuse directed towards women in politics, spotlighting research […]

Read Now
Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

The creation of the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) has led to a heated debate on the balance between peer review and evaluative metrics in research assessment regimes. Luciana Balboa, Elizabeth Gadd, Eva Mendez, Janne Pölönen, Karen Stroobants, Erzsebet Toth Cithra and the CoARA Steering Board address these arguments and state CoARA’s commitment to finding ways in which peer review and bibliometrics can be used together responsibly.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments