Innovation

Those Who Share Fake News Tend to Be Older: Study

February 28, 2019 3278

apple-applications-apps-607812.jpg

There have been numerous studies and analysis conducted on the 2016 US presidential election and the influence fake news and misinformation had on the eventual outcome. The rise of misinformation has seen it creep into popular culture with television shows like Homeland running fake news storylines modeled on Infowars founder Alex Jones and investigations into Russian troll factories regularly gracing our newscasts. However, two recent studies published last month have found that the sharing of fake news sources were extremely concentrated and rare and that in fact, the vast majority of people did not read, engage with or share fake news. An interesting outcome was that those who did share fake news tended to be older, white and were more conservative in their political beliefs. The two studies examined fake news on separate social media platforms; Facebook and Twitter, with both concluding that sharing this content was a rare occurrence but when users did share fake news articles they tended to be older Americans over 65.

This post was originally posted on sister site, SAGE Ocean, under the title, “Fake news sharing is rare but older people over 65 are more likely to share these articles, study finds.

The first study conducted by researchers (Grinberg et al) at Northeastern, Harvard and University of Buffalo and published in Science examined “exposure to and sharing of fake news by registered voters on Twitter“ and found that engagement with fake news sources was extremely concentrated. “Only 1% of individuals accounted for 80% of fake news source exposures, and 0.1% accounted for nearly 80% of fake news sources shared”. The research overwhelmingly indicated that those most likely to share fake news stories were older, conservative and very much engaged with politics.  

Also published last month in Science Advances was a study entitled “Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook” by Guess et al which found that the sharing of fake news sources was a rare occurrence in itself but interestingly, those that did partake in sharing these sources were over 65 and this group shared “nearly seven times as many articles from fake news domains as the youngest age group”.

Average number of fake news shares (and 95% CIs) using the list of domains derived from ( 7 ). (A) Party identification, (B) age group, (C) ideological self-placement, and (D) overall number of Facebook wall posts. Proportions adjusted to account for sample-matching weights derived from the third wave of the SMaPP YouGov panel survey.

Average number of fake news shares (and 95% CIs) using the list of domains derived from (7). (A) Party identification, (B) age group, (C) ideological self-placement, and (D) overall number of Facebook wall posts. Proportions adjusted to account for sample-matching weights derived from the third wave of the SMaPP YouGov panel survey.

Guess et al used “behavioral data on Facebook activity linked to individual level survey data” to conduct their research. The authors advocate a cross-discipline approach within the social sciences to further explore the main findings of the study and both Guess et al and Grinberg et al, allude to a lack of digital media literacy in older generations perhaps being a prevailing factor in their sharing of fake news and misinformation.

““Despite widespread interest in the fake news phenomenon, we know very little about who actually shares fake news,” says Joshua Tucker, a professor of politics at NYU and co-director of the SMaPP Lab. “This study takes a first step towards answering this question.


https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/01/190109142618.htm

“These findings pose a challenge and an opportunity for social scientists”. Guess et al goes on to state that “given the general lack of attention paid to the oldest generations in the study of political behavior thus far, more research is needed to better understand and contextualize the interaction of age and online political content”.

Digital media literacy has long been explored in other social science fields such as sociology and a combined effort across the social sciences would be beneficial to further explore the low levels of digital literacy among the baby boomer generation.

Guess et al also highlights the limited availability of such valuable data to academics, as seen in this study with a combined dataset made up from survey responses and digital trace data. It’s interesting to note that although the researchers had a high response rate, “half of our respondents with Facebook accounts opted not to share their profile data”, an issue commonly found across computational social science—access to data.

Researchers in both studies recognize the need for further exploration into the digital behavior of the older cohort to see if their findings hold true. Social media platforms themselves can do also do more to stop the tide and dissemination of misinformation.


SAGE Ocean, the sister site of Social Science Space, is part of a new SAGE Publishing initiative to support social scientists working with big data & new technology, while also focusing on new innovation in tech, data, and social science.

View all posts by SAGE Ocean

Related Articles

Ready to Tackle Global Challenges? Apply to Attend Dubai Showcase
Infrastructure
April 17, 2025

Ready to Tackle Global Challenges? Apply to Attend Dubai Showcase

Read Now
Long-Term Impact Requires Archiving Research Communication
Impact
March 14, 2025

Long-Term Impact Requires Archiving Research Communication

Read Now
Crystal Abidin on Influencers
Social Science Bites
March 3, 2025

Crystal Abidin on Influencers

Read Now
The Mystery of Xenotransplantation for Social Sciences
Innovation
February 27, 2025

The Mystery of Xenotransplantation for Social Sciences

Read Now
AI is Here, But Is It Here to Help Us or Replace Us?

AI is Here, But Is It Here to Help Us or Replace Us?

Decisions taken now around how generative AI is used by academics and universities will shape the future of research. Mark Carrigan argues whilst optimistic scenarios are possible, generative AI stands ready to feed into an existing productivity oriented framing of academic work.

Read Now
NAS Report Examines Nexus of AI and Workplace

NAS Report Examines Nexus of AI and Workplace

A 2024 report by the National Academies explores the latest advances in artificial intelligence (AI) technology and their potential effects on economic productivity, job stability, and income inequality. It also highlights key research opportunities and data needs to help workers and policymakers adapt to the evolving AI landscape.

Read Now
When Do You Need to Trust a GenAI’s Input to Your Innovation Process?

When Do You Need to Trust a GenAI’s Input to Your Innovation Process?

In this post, co-authors Frank T. Piller, Tucker J. Marion, and Mahdi Srour reflect on the inspiration behind their research article, “Generative […]

Read Now
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments