Industry

Anthropology Webinars Explore Fieldwork, Public Health, & Coronavirus

June 9, 2020 4156

In light of the global coronavirus pandemic, anthropologists around the world have been preparing to utilize knowledge gained from past pandemics to help with the coronavirus pandemic, and preparing to gain as much knowledge as possible to assist with any future pandemics. Anthropologists have also had to reconsider their methodologies in light of new strains on fieldwork.

With so much anthropological agenda-setting to do, it is clear that the coronavirus has gripped the world of anthropology. The World Council of Anthropological Associations (WCAA) has released, so far, two webinars relating to the effect of the spread of coronavirus on anthropology, and the effect (and potential effect) of anthropology on the coronavirus. The webinars can be found for free online by clicking here.

First Webinar: Culture and public health in the era of coronavirus

The first webinar brings together academics from Portugal, France, Norway, Brazil, the United States of America, Kenya, and China to speak on issues relating to public health, culture, and anthropological research (primarily medical anthropology). Each speaker relays the coronavirus situation in their respective community and provides information about what anthropologists & medical anthropologists are doing about the situation, what they can learn from past epidemics, and how they are preparing to analyze the data that may come from the situation.

The speakers also take the opportunity to talk about the profound ways in which the global pandemic is changing our approaches to connectivity, interculturalism, and global communication. For one example: Charles Briggs from the USA. “Thinking across platforms, countries, peoples, is no longer an agenda,” Charles Briggs, at UC Berkeley, says. “It is survival.” In an epidemic, he continues, “communication should spring from biomedical authority– not political expediency, or the bottom-lines of media-based organizations.” He suggests that the present predicament is ripe for reconceiving of the way in which the USA conflates politics, medicine, and mediatization. Each speaker brings something fresh and interesting to the table with regard to the way in which the political, media, and other power structures have handled (or mishandled) the coronavirus in each respective country.

Second Webinar: Fieldwork in an era of Pandemia: digital (and other) alternatives

The second webinar brings together speakers from Australia, India, Japan, Mexico, and the United Kingdom to tackle issues related to anthropological fieldwork and research disruption.

The webinar is loosely defined by a few questions: “What technologies are out there for anthropologists when face-to-face observations are impossible? What are the advantages and disadvantages of interviewing online? How can we access and publish data while in a pandemic? And should large data sets be considered? Each speaker goes beyond the questions to discuss their own experiences and remedies with regard to research disruption. The speakers also inject, like in the prior webinar, the local & national response to the pandemic from each respective area.

Both webinars can be found for free online by clicking here.

Augustus Wachbrit (or, if you’re intimidated by his three-syllable name, Gus) is the Social Science Communications Intern at SAGE Publishing. He assists in the creation, curation, revision, and distribution of various forms of written content primarily for Social Science Space and Method Space. He is studying Philosophy and English at California Lutheran University, where he is a research fellow and department assistant. If you’re likely to find him anywhere, he’ll be studying from a textbook, writing (either academically or creatively), exercising, or defying all odds and doing all these things at once.

View all posts by Gus Wachbrit

Related Articles

Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do
Communication
October 23, 2024

Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do

Read Now
Diving Into OSTP’s ‘Blueprint’ for Using Social and Behavioral Science in Policy
Bookshelf
October 14, 2024

Diving Into OSTP’s ‘Blueprint’ for Using Social and Behavioral Science in Policy

Read Now
All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture
Event
October 10, 2024

All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture

Read Now
‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land
International Debate
September 27, 2024

‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

Read Now
Webinar: Banned Books Week 2024

Webinar: Banned Books Week 2024

As book bans and academic censorship escalate across the United States, this free hour-long webinar gathers experts to discuss the impact these […]

Read Now
Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

The creation of the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) has led to a heated debate on the balance between peer review and evaluative metrics in research assessment regimes. Luciana Balboa, Elizabeth Gadd, Eva Mendez, Janne Pölönen, Karen Stroobants, Erzsebet Toth Cithra and the CoARA Steering Board address these arguments and state CoARA’s commitment to finding ways in which peer review and bibliometrics can be used together responsibly.

Read Now
Revisiting the ‘Research Parasite’ Debate in the Age of AI

Revisiting the ‘Research Parasite’ Debate in the Age of AI

The large language models, or LLMs, that underlie generative AI tools such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT, have an ethical challenge in how they parasitize freely available data.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments