Recognition

Nobelist David Card Made the Minimum Wage Respectable

October 12, 2021 4036

Every year Australia’s Fair Work Commission considers whether to raise the minimum wage. And every year business leaders warn doing it will cost jobs.

This year’s Nobel Prize in economics has been awarded to US-based economist David Card for his work with Alan Krueger in reversing this perception.

Before Card and Krueger “everyone knew” that imposing or increasing a minimum wage would cost jobs. Employers wouldn’t have the money to keep on as many staff.

Card and Krueger work turned that proposition into the Loch Ness Monster of economics – often discussed but never actually seen. It wasn’t just that economists weren’t looking hard enough to find it, it was that it wasn’t there.

In an influential article in 1994, later expanded into a book, Card and Krueger examined a “natural experiment.” In 1992 the US state of New Jersey increased its minimum wage to be the highest in the US. The neighboring state of Pennsylvania did not.

Surveying fast food workers either side of the border

Fast food outlets employ many workers on the minimum wage.

The Conversation logo
This article by John Hawkins originally appeared on The Conversation, a Social Science Space partner site, under the title “Introducing David Card, the 2021 Nobel Prize in Economics winner who made the minimum wage respectable”

Card and Krueger surveyed around 400 outlets on either side of the state border. They wanted to see whether there was any difference in the changes in the numbers of workers employed in the cities that were near each other but differed only in what they had done to the minimum wage.

They found “no indication” that the rise in the minimum wage cost jobs.

A 2021 study found support for minimum wages had spread to institutions as well-pedigreed as the International Monetary Fund and the OECD.

It described Card and Kreuger’s paper as “central to this change in view.”

Card and Kreuger’s work has been cited in judgements of Australia’s Fair Work Commission.

It means their work has helped determine the incomes of low wage workers in a country half a world away, a classic example of economist John Maynard Keynes’ dictum about the impact of academic scribblers.

“Madmen in authority, who hear voices in the air,” Keynes wrote, “are distilling their frenzy from some academic scribbler of a few years back.”

‘Natural experiments’

In another study casting doubt on received wisdom, Card examined the impact of immigration on the wages and employment of locals. He found it was tiny.

A sad aspect of this year’s Nobel is that Card could not share it with his co-author. Alan Kreuger arguably made an even greater contribution to economics. His work ranged from the economics of inequality and rock music to terrorism. Kreuger also served as chair of President Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers. Tragically he took his own life in 2019. Nobels are not awarded posthumously.

Instead the prize was shared with Joshua Angrist and Guido Imbens. Their Nobels were for “methodological contributions to the analysis of causal relationships.”

In many cases economists can’t do controlled experiments. Governments are reluctant to boost the minimum wages of just half of the workforce so that economists can see what happens.

Instead economists create “natural experiments” using things such as the differences between cities on either side of borders. Angrist and Imbens helped establish a framework for how to conduct them.

Potential future winner Susan Athey. (Photo: Christopher Michel/Stanford)

The award of this year’s Nobel to three US-based men did little to point to diversity in economics.

Male, middle-aged, American

A possible indicator of a future winner is that Susan Athey was this month elected 2022 president of the American Economics Association.

Her research interests include the economics of the internet and news media, machine learning, big data and cryptocurrencies.

This year’s winner David Card is the current president of the American Economics Association, as have been many other previous Nobel winners.

Athey was also the first woman to win the John Bates Clark Medal which is awarded to the American economist under the age of 40 judged to have made the most significant contribution to economic thought and knowledge.

Card is one of many John Bates Clark Medal winners to later win a Nobel.


Some readings by David Card

SAGE Publishing, the parent of Social Science Space, has published many of David Card’s academic articles over the years. Below is a selection.

School Resources and Student Outcomes” | David Card and Alan Krueger, from the September 1998 volume of the ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

The Impact of Deregulation on the Employment and Wages of Airline Mechanics” | David Card in the July 1986 volume of the Industrial and Labor Relations Review

Using Regional Variation in Wages to Measure the Effects of the Federal Minimum Wage” | David Card in the October 1992 volume of the Industrial and Labor Relations Review

The Impact of the Mariel Boatlift on the Miami Labor Market” | David Card in the January 1990 volume of the Industrial and Labor Relations Review

Do Minimum Wages Reduce Employment? A Case Study of California, 1987–89” | David Card in the October 1992 volume of the Industrial and Labor Relations Review

Would the Elimination of Affirmative Action Affect Highly Qualified Minority Applicants? Evidence from California and Texas” | David Card and Alan Krueger in the April 2005 volume of the Industrial and Labor Relations Review

John Hawkins is a senior lecturer at the Canberra School of Politics, Economics and Society and NATSEM, University of Canberra. He has headed the economics division at the Hong Kong Monetary Authority and been a senior economist with the Reserve Bank of Australia, Bank for International Settlements and Australian Treasury and secretary to the Senate Economics Committee.

View all posts by John Hawkins

Related Articles

Celebrating Excellence: The 2024 Humanities and Social Science Canada Prize Winners Announced 
Announcements
December 19, 2024

Celebrating Excellence: The 2024 Humanities and Social Science Canada Prize Winners Announced 

Read Now
Young Scholars Can’t Take the Field in Game of  Academic Metrics
Infrastructure
December 18, 2024

Young Scholars Can’t Take the Field in Game of Academic Metrics

Read Now
Canada’s Storytellers Challenge Seeks Compelling Narratives About Student Research
Communication
November 21, 2024

Canada’s Storytellers Challenge Seeks Compelling Narratives About Student Research

Read Now
Tom Burns, 1959-2024: A Pioneer in Learning Development 
Impact
November 5, 2024

Tom Burns, 1959-2024: A Pioneer in Learning Development 

Read Now
Alondra Nelson Named to U.S. National Science Board

Alondra Nelson Named to U.S. National Science Board

Sociologist Alondra Nelson, who until last year was deputy (and at times acting) director of the White House Office of Science and […]

Read Now
Viewing 2024 Economics Nobel Through Lens of Colonialism’s Impact on Institutions

Viewing 2024 Economics Nobel Through Lens of Colonialism’s Impact on Institutions

This year’s Nobel memorial prize in economics has gone to Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and […]

Read Now
Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

The creation of the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) has led to a heated debate on the balance between peer review and evaluative metrics in research assessment regimes. Luciana Balboa, Elizabeth Gadd, Eva Mendez, Janne Pölönen, Karen Stroobants, Erzsebet Toth Cithra and the CoARA Steering Board address these arguments and state CoARA’s commitment to finding ways in which peer review and bibliometrics can be used together responsibly.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments