Impact

ESRC Early Career Honor Recognizes Researcher Examining Renewable Energy Policies

February 14, 2022 1456
Wind turbines seen across the Eaglesham moor at Scotland's Whitelee Wind Farm.
Wind turbines seen across the Eaglesham moor at Scotland’s Whitelee Wind Farm.
Rebecca Windemer
Rebecca Windemer

Rebecca Windemer, a lecturer at the University of the West of England who studies renewable energy amid the communities where it is generated, received the Economic and Social Research Council’s 2021 Celebrating Impact Prize for the Outstanding Early Career Impact.

The Celebrating Impact competition recognizes and rewards researchers who have achieved impact through outstanding research, knowledge exchange activities, collaborative partnerships, and engagement with different communities – and who received funding from Britain’s Economic and Social Research Council. Winners were announced late last year.

Since it was established nine years ago, the Celebrating Impact Prize has highlighted and recognized some of the ways in which ESRC-funded research impacts the economy and society. The awards for 2021 especially reflect contributions being made by the social sciences to helping communities and businesses navigate the challenges facing us including recovery from the global pandemic is critical to not only the UK but also globally.

All winners and finalists have demonstrated the impact of their work and illustrated its relevance and importance to society. They are already contributing to policy debates in their specialist areas and their influence will continue in years to come. 

Last year’s prize categories are Outstanding Early Career Impact; Outstanding Business and Enterprise ImpactOutstanding International ImpactOutstanding Public Policy Impact; and Outstanding Societal Impact. Below we highlight the Outstanding Early Career Impact winner.

As part of her research, Windemer analyzed all planning and energy policies relevant to the duration and end of life of onshore wind and solar farms. She also reviewed the planning documents for all applications to repower or extend the duration of the planning consent for existing onshore wind farms in England, Wales and Scotland. She undertook in depth studies at four wind farms and one solar farm involving interviewing developers, planners, local authorities, opposition groups, and communities, and undertook surveys of 710 residents living within 3.5 kilometers of two wind farms.

Research into the 25-year planning consents that regulate the UK’s onshore wind and solar farms has led to policy change in Wales. It has also led to greater guidance for local authorities and the wind industry on end-of-life considerations for onshore renewable energy infrastructure.

Some of the impacts that Windemer’s work has created are:

  • Scottish Government policymakers using Windemer’s research to inform the update of their onshore wind policy
  • Establishing supportive approaches towards onshore renewable energy through greater consideration of the options for ageing infrastructure
  • Increased public awareness of the challenges of time-limited planning consents, of the need for a more detailed planning policy and guidance for end-of life options, and the opportunities for local communities to shape the future of onshore wind and solar farms

“Three main options exist for end of-life sites: first, to extend the planning consent of original infrastructure; second, to repower by replacing existing sites with newer, more efficient infrastructure; or third, to decommission entirely,” says Windemer.

Learn more about decision-making on ageing infrastructure and Windemer’s research:

Hailey Lanford is a senior at The George Washington University, studying English and linguistics. She is a SAGE global communications intern, Virginia Young Poets in the Community fellow, and enjoys exploring Washington, D.C.

View all posts by Hailey Lanford

Related Articles

Celebrating Excellence: The 2024 Humanities and Social Science Canada Prize Winners Announced 
Announcements
December 19, 2024

Celebrating Excellence: The 2024 Humanities and Social Science Canada Prize Winners Announced 

Read Now
Young Scholars Can’t Take the Field in Game of  Academic Metrics
Infrastructure
December 18, 2024

Young Scholars Can’t Take the Field in Game of Academic Metrics

Read Now
Canada’s Storytellers Challenge Seeks Compelling Narratives About Student Research
Communication
November 21, 2024

Canada’s Storytellers Challenge Seeks Compelling Narratives About Student Research

Read Now
Tom Burns, 1959-2024: A Pioneer in Learning Development 
Impact
November 5, 2024

Tom Burns, 1959-2024: A Pioneer in Learning Development 

Read Now
Alondra Nelson Named to U.S. National Science Board

Alondra Nelson Named to U.S. National Science Board

Sociologist Alondra Nelson, who until last year was deputy (and at times acting) director of the White House Office of Science and […]

Read Now
Viewing 2024 Economics Nobel Through Lens of Colonialism’s Impact on Institutions

Viewing 2024 Economics Nobel Through Lens of Colonialism’s Impact on Institutions

This year’s Nobel memorial prize in economics has gone to Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and […]

Read Now
Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

The creation of the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) has led to a heated debate on the balance between peer review and evaluative metrics in research assessment regimes. Luciana Balboa, Elizabeth Gadd, Eva Mendez, Janne Pölönen, Karen Stroobants, Erzsebet Toth Cithra and the CoARA Steering Board address these arguments and state CoARA’s commitment to finding ways in which peer review and bibliometrics can be used together responsibly.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments