News

Biden White House Resurrects Social and Behavioral Science Advisory Panel

April 13, 2022 3628

The White House announced last week that the Office of Science and Technology Policy’s National Science and Technology Council will re-commission the Social and Behavioral Sciences Subcommittee of the Committee on Science. The announcement came as part of the Biden administration’s “Year of Evidence for Action,” co-hosted by OSTP and Office of Management and Budget, and was one of a number of specific initiatives aimed at upgrading the creation and use of evidence in government. 

The OSTP advises the executive branch of the U.S. government on the scientific, engineering, and technological aspects of the economy, national security, homeland security, health, foreign relations, and the environment. It is currently headed by a social scientist, Alondra Nelson

The Social And Behavioral Sciences (SBS) subcommittee was created in President Obama’s second term, then eliminated in the beginning of the Trump administration as part of its broader structural changes on science policy. The subcommittee represented more than a dozen organizations across government, including the Departments of Defense, Agriculture, Health and Human Services. During its first incarnation the collaborative group completed more than 30 pilots with rigorous evaluations. Examples included highlighting an approach to home energy efficiency by focusing on the short-term and relatable benefits of saving money on their utility bills, rather than trying to sell the goal of making a dent in climate change. Other projects included helping Americans and servicemembers better plan for retirement

The revamped subcommittee will carry out short-term, high-priority tasks using SBS evidence in federal government practices and policies. The first short-term task, based on the subcommittee’s charter, is a federal government-wide overview of SBS research that can advance evidence-based policymaking. The delivery date for this review is April 30, 2023. The next goal will be to lay the groundwork for longer-term coordination of agency efforts related to these topics. This is part of a larger campaign by President Biden to signal that science matters under his watch. As SBS funding requests confirm, this definitively includes social and behvioral science among the physical, medical and engineering sciences that usually receive the spotlight. 

The Biden administration also announced partnerships with academic and nonprofit groups that “have demonstrated expertise in translating research evidence to practice and policy,” according to the White House. These partners include the Data Foundation; the Evidence-to-Impact Collaborative at the Pennsylvania State University; the Institute for Research on Race and Public Policy at the University of Illinois-Chicago and the Center for Tax and Budget AccountabilityPew Charitable Trusts; the Policy Lab at Brown UniversityResults for America; and the Urban Institute.   

Maxine Terry is a corporate communications specialist with SAGE Publishing. She previously covered judiciary and housing policy as a legislative assistant to U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow of Michigan.

View all posts by Maxine Terry

Related Articles

Tracking Federal Changes Affecting U.S. Education and Science
Resources
February 13, 2025

Tracking Federal Changes Affecting U.S. Education and Science

Read Now
Those ‘Indirect Costs’ Targeted by DOGE Directly Support America’s Research Excellence
News
February 12, 2025

Those ‘Indirect Costs’ Targeted by DOGE Directly Support America’s Research Excellence

Read Now
What Would Be the Point of Abolishing the US Education Department? An Anthropologist Explains
Public Policy
February 10, 2025

What Would Be the Point of Abolishing the US Education Department? An Anthropologist Explains

Read Now
Palestine – Donald Trump’s Vietnam?
News
February 5, 2025

Palestine – Donald Trump’s Vietnam?

Read Now
Survey Says … Most People Trust Scientists

Survey Says … Most People Trust Scientists

Public trust in scientists is vital. It can help us with personal decisions on matters like health and provide evidence-based policymaking to […]

Read Now
Young Scholars Can’t Take the Field in Game of  Academic Metrics

Young Scholars Can’t Take the Field in Game of Academic Metrics

Drawing on discussions with academics who have oriented their work around public engagement and social impact, Daniel Pearson suggests these academics present an opportunity to rethink the existing structures of reward and recognition in higher education.

Read Now
Why Might RFK Jr Be Good for US Health Care?

Why Might RFK Jr Be Good for US Health Care?

The proposed appointment of Robert F Kennedy Jr as secretary for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has provoked howls […]

Read Now
5 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments