Impact

Paper on Danish National Patient Register Keeps on Giving After 10 Years

July 29, 2022 2515

Public records are the basis for a large swath of medical and social science research. So it’s not surprising that guides to these records would prove popular in the academic community. But just how popular? 

In the case of “The Danish National Patient Register,” published in 2011 in the Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, the answer is “very popular.” That article, by Elsebeth Lynge, Jakob Lynge Sandegaard, and Matejka Rebolj, is one of the three most-cited articles appearing in a SAGE Publishing journal that year and so is receiving a 10-Year Impact Award from the publisher. (SAGE is the parent of Social Science Space.) 

10-year Impact Award graphic

SAGE started the 10-Year Impact Awards in 2020 as one way to demonstrate the value of social and behavioral science. While article citations and journal impact factors are the standard measure of literature-based impact in academia, these measures’ two- or five-year window don’t account for papers whose influence grows over time or that are recognized at a later date. This is especially acute in the social sciences, where impact factors “tend to underestimate” the value of social science research because of time lags and social science’s interest in new approaches, rather than solely iterative ones. 

The patient register paper, for example, has racked up more than 2,800 citations since it was published, making it the third-most cited paper from SAGE’s class of 2011. The paper offers an overview of the Danish National Patient Register, established in 1977, and it expanded its remit to include information on all patients in Danish hospitals. The authors write that while the register “is considered to be the finest of its kind internationally,” although they do point out some of the issues that can arise in large data sets that have evolved over time.

Elsebeth Lynge , left, and Matjka Rebolj

We asked the lead author, Elsebeth Lynge, now a professor in the Section of Environmental Health at University of Copenhagen, a few questions about the paper. Since publication, co-author Jakob Lynge Sandegaard, then with Denmark’s National Board of Health, is now SAS specialist at Handelsbanken Danmark, and Matejka Rebolj, then with the Institute of Public Health at the University of Copenhagen is now a senior epidemiologist at King’s College London. 

In your estimation, what in your research – and obviously the published paper – is it that has inspired others or that they have glommed onto?  

The paper became a standard reference for researchers using data from the Danish Patient Register. 

How have others built on what you published? (And how have you yourself built on it?)  

Yes, since then more papers have been published about the Danish Patient Register. [A 2015 paper in Clinical Epidemiology, “The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential,” has almost 2,500 citations, for example.] 

Has your paper had any effect on the operations or policies of the Danish government – or other national bodies in Denmark or outside of Denmark? 

The paper was part of a collection of papers on Danish public population and health registers. The papers have been widely used by researchers, and use of registers for research purposes is supported by public authorities in Denmark.  

What, if anything, would you have done differently in the paper (or underlying research) if you were to go back in time and do it again?  

Well, the paper was published 10 years ago, and an updated version would need additions. 

Could you name a paper (or other scholarly work) that has had the most, or at least a large, impact on you and your work? 

The textbooks on cancer epidemiology by Norman Breslow and Nicholas Day.

Sage, the parent of Social Science Space, is a global academic publisher of books, journals, and library resources with a growing range of technologies to enable discovery, access, and engagement. Believing that research and education are critical in shaping society, 24-year-old Sara Miller McCune founded Sage in 1965. Today, we are controlled by a group of trustees charged with maintaining our independence and mission indefinitely. 

View all posts by Sage

Related Articles

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures
Impact
September 23, 2024

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

Read Now
Paper to Advance Debate on Dual-Process Theories Genuinely Advanced Debate
Impact
September 18, 2024

Paper to Advance Debate on Dual-Process Theories Genuinely Advanced Debate

Read Now
Webinar: Fundamentals of Research Impact
Event
September 4, 2024

Webinar: Fundamentals of Research Impact

Read Now
Paper Opening Science to the New Statistics Proves Its Import a Decade Later
Impact
July 2, 2024

Paper Opening Science to the New Statistics Proves Its Import a Decade Later

Read Now
A Milestone Dataset on the Road to Self-Driving Cars Proves Highly Popular

A Milestone Dataset on the Road to Self-Driving Cars Proves Highly Popular

The idea of an autonomous vehicle – i.e., a self-driving car – isn’t particularly new. Leonardo da Vinci had some ideas he […]

Read Now
Why Social Science? Because It Can Help Contribute to AI That Benefits Society

Why Social Science? Because It Can Help Contribute to AI That Benefits Society

Social sciences can also inform the design and creation of ethical frameworks and guidelines for AI development and for deployment into systems. Social scientists can contribute expertise: on data quality, equity, and reliability; on how bias manifests in AI algorithms and decision-making processes; on how AI technologies impact marginalized communities and exacerbate existing inequities; and on topics such as fairness, transparency, privacy, and accountability.

Read Now
Digital Scholarly Records are Facing New Risks

Digital Scholarly Records are Facing New Risks

Drawing on a study of Crossref DOI data, Martin Eve finds evidence to suggest that the current standard of digital preservation could fall worryingly short of ensuring persistent accurate record of scholarly works.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments