News

ERSC Celebrating Impact Prize 2022 Winners Announced

November 14, 2022 1727

Britain’s Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) announced winners in six categories of its Celebrating Impact Prize 2022 earlier this month. Now in its 10th year, the prize celebrates the success of ESRC-funded researchers in achieving and enabling outstanding economic or societal impact from excellent research. The ESRC is the UK’s largest funder of research on social and economic questions.

The Celebrating Impact competition recognizes and rewards researchers who have achieved impact through outstanding research, knowledge exchange activities, collaborative partnerships, and engagement with different communities – and who received funding from Britain’s Economic and Social Research Council.

ESRC Celebrating Impact logo

“This year’s Impact Prize finalists, and especially the winners, exemplify the insight and support that social science research can produce, helping make a genuine difference at the local, national and international level,” ESRC’s interim Executive Chair, Professor Alison Park CBE, said.

This year, the John Hills Impact Prize category was created, recognizing a social scientist whose work has benefitted society and has encouraged lasting changes in the quality of the lives of a significant number of people over a sustained period.

Winners were awarded £10,000 to be put towards the exchange of knowledge, public engagement and promoting the impacts of their work.

The winners and their focuses of study are:

Outstanding Business Impact: Professor Susan Durbin (University of the West of England), empowering women in the aviation and aerospace industry

Outstanding Early Career Impact: Dr Pamela Buchan (University of Exeter), harnessing people’s passion for the ocean to protect the marine environment

Outstanding International Impact: Team application: Electoral Psychology Observatory, led by professor Michael Bruter (London School of Economics), improving election fairness and participation

Outstanding Public Policy Impact: Team application: Project 2.5: Issues in the financing of Higher Education, Centre for Global Higher Education, led by professor Lorraine Dearden (University College London), transforming university access for poorer students in Colombia

Outstanding Societal Impact: Dr. Daisy Fancourt (University College London), shaping community responses to the psychological and social impacts of COVID-19

John Hills Impact Prize 2022: Professor Heather Joshi CBE, IOE (Centre for Longitudinal Studies, University College London), exposing social inequalities and working to break the cycle of disadvantage

Molly Gahagen is a third-year student at Johns Hopkins University studying political science and international studies. She is currently the social science communications intern at SAGE Publishing.

View all posts by Molly Gahagen

Related Articles

Canada’s Storytellers Challenge Seeks Compelling Narratives About Student Research
Communication
November 21, 2024

Canada’s Storytellers Challenge Seeks Compelling Narratives About Student Research

Read Now
Exploring the Citation Nexus of Life Sciences and Social Sciences
Industry
November 6, 2024

Exploring the Citation Nexus of Life Sciences and Social Sciences

Read Now
Tom Burns, 1959-2024: A Pioneer in Learning Development 
Impact
November 5, 2024

Tom Burns, 1959-2024: A Pioneer in Learning Development 

Read Now
Alondra Nelson Named to U.S. National Science Board
Announcements
October 18, 2024

Alondra Nelson Named to U.S. National Science Board

Read Now
Lee Miller: Ethics, photography and ethnography

Lee Miller: Ethics, photography and ethnography

Kate Winslet’s biopic of Lee Miller, the pioneering woman war photographer, raises some interesting questions about the ethics of fieldwork and their […]

Read Now
‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

The term ‘settler colonialism’ was coined by an Australian historian in the 1960s to describe the occupation of a territory with a […]

Read Now
Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

The creation of the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) has led to a heated debate on the balance between peer review and evaluative metrics in research assessment regimes. Luciana Balboa, Elizabeth Gadd, Eva Mendez, Janne Pölönen, Karen Stroobants, Erzsebet Toth Cithra and the CoARA Steering Board address these arguments and state CoARA’s commitment to finding ways in which peer review and bibliometrics can be used together responsibly.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments