Business and Management INK

Rethinking Approaches to Management Research During Times Marked by Rare, Yet Increasingly Impactful Events

July 23, 2024 626

In this article, Vanessa C. Hasse reflects upon what drove her interest in researching rare but impactful events, as well as the implications associated with their inherent complexity and increasing frequency. The full argument is laid out in her recently published commentary, “From trailing behind to shaping the curve: Researching rare and impactful events for societal benefit,” in Business & Society.

In recent times, an increasing number of phenomena that seem rare and unexpected, even unprecedented, have unfurled upon societies around the world with massive impact. Often, the specific manifestations of such inherently complex events (e.g. artificial intelligence or infectious disease outbreaks, including the Covid-19 pandemic) are difficult to predict in foresight, leaving communities largely underprepared. The driving motivation for the recently published commentary was thus to explore how management research can aid in mitigating the negative impact such events exert upon businesses and societies at large.

As a starting point, I explored how the above examples are represented in publications across 24 leading management journals (1950-2023). The results were striking in terms of how clearly they demonstrated an inherent tendency: both phenomena remained largely absent from publications during their decades-long latencies but received sudden attention following the onset of their exponential phases. This suggests that much of management research trails behind the curve – with consequential implications for global health, economic activity, and peace. With little scholarly insights ahead of the most impactful phase, business executives and policymakers are left to determine responses that may lack in scientific grounding and rely on after-the-fact guidance that becomes outdated quickly.

I thus endeavored to explore possible reasons for this “ex-postism” tendency across management research. First, management research is rooted in a paradigm focused on deriving predictions from existing theory. While this has aided significant scientific advances, it largely incentivizes research on non-outlier phenomena. After all, how could something be studied rigorously when it has not (yet) materialized? Second, certain contexts may be overrepresented in management research. Infectious disease outbreaks, for instance, occur with relative frequency in lower-income contexts but were only reflected in publications once the Covid-19 outbreak reached pandemic status, impacting countries across all income levels. Third, quantitative conventions within management research are often based on assumptions of normal distributions, leading researchers to malleate outlier data into shape. As a result, phenomena which are rare but have the potential to exert massive impact are largely disregarded.

A call for a paradigm shift towards “ex-anteism” in management research is thus imperative – but actionable suggestions are non-trivial, given realities such as limited space in leading journals, opportunity costs for scholars, and reviewer inclinations towards non-outlier phenomena. Inspired by recent work from Ali Aslan Gümüsay, Juliane Reinecke, Pratima Bansal, Garima Sharma, and others, three avenues seemed most promising. First, management research can generate novel insights by tapping into the rich tradition of imaginative theorizing. Focused on critiquing plausible pathways instead of generating predictions with large degrees of freedom, these models optimize for adaptability and antifragility. Second, management research should embrace the distribution of data (including outliers) and contextualization through qualitative approaches and wider temporal/spatial lenses. Finally, to construct better warning systems, management scholars ought to lead in building widely spun co-creative knowledge networks involving a diversity of stakeholders. Especially the latter offers an opportunity for elevating the usefulness of management research for societal benefit – after all, the next unexpected event is already on its way.

Vanessa C. Hasse is an assistant professor of international business at the Ivey Business School, Western University (Canada). Her primary research interests focus on exploring firm-level responses to performance signals (including those triggered by crises/rare events) in an international context, as well as the impact cultural and temporal dimensions have on managerial decision-making.

View all posts by Vanessa Hasse

Related Articles

Navigating CSR Communication in an Age of Polarization
Business and Management INK
December 18, 2024

Navigating CSR Communication in an Age of Polarization

Read Now
What European SMEs Can Teach Us About Innovation and Informal Human Resource Management
Business and Management INK
December 16, 2024

What European SMEs Can Teach Us About Innovation and Informal Human Resource Management

Read Now
When Do You Need to Trust a GenAI’s Input to Your Innovation Process?
Business and Management INK
December 13, 2024

When Do You Need to Trust a GenAI’s Input to Your Innovation Process?

Read Now
Using Intelligent Self-Limitation to Explore the Distinction Between Environment and Umwelt
Business and Management INK
December 6, 2024

Using Intelligent Self-Limitation to Explore the Distinction Between Environment and Umwelt

Read Now
The Authors of ‘Artificial Intelligence and Work’ on Future Risk

The Authors of ‘Artificial Intelligence and Work’ on Future Risk

During the final stages of editing the proofs for Artificial Intelligence and Work: Transforming Work, Organizations, and Society in an Age of Insecurity, […]

Read Now
From Conflict to Peace: Reflecting on the Leadership of John Hume in Northern Ireland

From Conflict to Peace: Reflecting on the Leadership of John Hume in Northern Ireland

In this post, author Joanne Murphy reflects on the life and legacy of John Hume, the topic of her article, “Leadership, liminality, […]

Read Now
The End of Meaningful CSR?

The End of Meaningful CSR?

In this article, co-authors W. Lance Bennet and Julie Uldam reflect on the inspiration behind their research article, “Corporate Social Responsibility in […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments