Business and Management INK

Does CEO Morality Matter for Their Firms’ ESG Performance?

August 12, 2024 877

In this article, co-authors Eunice SQ Ng, Riyang Phang, and Eugene Kang reflect on the importance of considering Chief Executive Officers’ moral foundations when engaging on their firms’ environmental, social, and governance issues. Their research article, “CEO Moral Foundations and Firms’ Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance,” highlights the impact of CEO binding versus individualizing MFs on corporate ESG performance and can be found in Strategic Organization.

Does something as fundamental and innate as chief executive officers’ (CEO) moral foundations (MFs) affect firms’ environmental, social, and governance (ESG) outcomes? If MFs are formed in advance of experience and are relatively stable in adulthood, do stakeholder engagements with firms’ CEOs still matter in shaping corporate ESG performance? Questions around individual-level antecedents of firms’ ESG performance triggered our exploration of the role of CEO MFs within corporate ESG issues.

Our study found that CEO MFs do influence firms’ ESG performance. The article examines the impact of two higher-order MFs – binding MFs and individualizing MFs – on a broad-based measure of ESG performance. Our results show that CEOs with higher binding MFs negatively affect their firms’ ESG performance while CEOs with higher individualizing MFs positively affect their firms’ ESG performance. We posit that this is due to the range of ESG issues that CEOs attend to, with binding MFs focusing on specific firm-identified stakeholders’ ESG demands while individualizing MFs focus on firms’ impacts on individuals at large.

Nevertheless, we do not believe that one set of moral standards is superior to another. As much as higher broad-based ESG performance implies better outcomes for society and the natural environment, our exploratory analyses show that this may compromise higher shareholder wealth. Discussions around financial versus ESG performance are far more nuanced than pitting one performance dimension against another. Instead, our study hopes to inform stakeholders on how they can leverage certain ESG rhetoric to engage CEOs with different MFs productively.

What does this mean for stakeholders seeking to drive greater corporate ESG performance? By identifying CEOs’ MFs, stakeholders can assess which stakeholder group will serve as the most effective conduit for conveying ESG messages to CEOs. For example, CEOs with higher binding MFs will attend to in-group stakeholder groups’ ESG demands more, making them effective message bearers. Stakeholders can also consider how their ESG messages are framed, such as highlighting the impact of firms’ ESG activities on in-group stakeholder groups or on individuals at large. CEOs with higher binding MFs are likely to respond more when their in-group stakeholder groups’ interests are affected, while CEOs with higher individualizing MFs will be more concerned about issues of harm and fairness. Hence, stakeholders must consider both the message bearer and the message when engaging with CEOs about their firms’ ESG issues. 

Another key contribution of our study is the use of textual analysis to measure CEO MFs within strategic management literature. While such an approach has been used to measure CEO psychological constructs such as narcissism, regulatory focus, temporal focus, and commitment to status quo, to our knowledge our study is the first to achieve this with MFs and demonstrate MFs impact on firm-level outcomes. In doing so, we draw attention to the impact of individual-level morality on firm-level outcomes, with implications for society and the natural environment. We hope our study will serve as a launchpad for further research on the role of individuals’ moral standards within business, society, and the natural environment.

Eunice SQ Ng (pictured) is a lecturer and resident fellow at Ridge View Residential College, National University of Singapore. Her research interests lie at the intersection of sustainability and organizational paradoxes. Eunice also teaches interdisciplinary courses on the role of culture and communities in sustainable development within the contexts of Southeast Asia and Singapore. Riyang Phang is an assistant professor in the school of entrepreneurship and business administration at the American University of Central Asia, Kyrgyzstan. He was the lead behavioral scientist for a bank and family conglomerate in the Philippines, and is currently a visiting researcher at ETH Zurich SEC. Eugene Kang is an associate professor in the department of strategy, international business and entrepreneurship at the Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. He adopts an interdisciplinary perspective in his research, which primarily examines corporate governance, spillover effects, and sustainability.

View all posts by Eunice SQ Ng, Riyang Phang, and Eugene Kang

Related Articles

The Role of Place in Sustainability
Business and Management INK
October 28, 2024

The Role of Place in Sustainability

Read Now
Turning to Glitter in Management Studies – Why We Should Take ‘Unserious’ Glitter Serious to Understand New Management Practices
Business and Management INK
October 24, 2024

Turning to Glitter in Management Studies – Why We Should Take ‘Unserious’ Glitter Serious to Understand New Management Practices

Read Now
Utilizing Academic-Practitioner Partnering for Societal Impact
Business and Management INK
September 17, 2024

Utilizing Academic-Practitioner Partnering for Societal Impact

Read Now
Trippin’ Forward: Management Research and the Development of Psychedelics
Business and Management INK
September 9, 2024

Trippin’ Forward: Management Research and the Development of Psychedelics

Read Now
Using Ethnography to Explore Entrepreneurial Extracurricular Activities

Using Ethnography to Explore Entrepreneurial Extracurricular Activities

Co-authors Birgitte Wraae and Nicolai Nybye reflect on the inspiration behind their research article, “Learning to Be “Me,” “the Team,” and “the Company” Through Entrepreneurial Extracurricular Activities: An Ethnographic Approach,” published in Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy.

Read Now
The Future of Business is Interdisciplinary 

The Future of Business is Interdisciplinary 

By actively collaborating with industry, developing interdisciplinary programs and investing in hands-on learning opportunities, business schools can equip graduates with the specific skills and experiences that employers are seeking.

Read Now
The Co-Creation Edge in Marketing Education

The Co-Creation Edge in Marketing Education

In this article, co-authors Maria Petrescu, John T. Gironda, Anjala S. Krishen, Adina Dudau, J. Ricky Fergurson, Steven A. Stewart, Philip Kitchen, and Monica Fine reflect on the inspiration behind […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments