Business and Management INK

In this article, co-authors Pedro Monteiro, Davide Nicolini, Ingrid Erickson, Lisa Cohen, Gina Dokko, Greetje Corporaal, Arvind Karunakaran, Beth Bechky, and Siobhan O’Mahony provide an overview of their academic article, “Beyond the Buzz: Scholarly Approaches to the Study of Work,” published in the Journal of Management Inquiry.

The nature of work is changing rapidly, driven by social and technological transformations. Amidst these shifts, there is a growing debate about work and its future in popular and academic conversations. Yet, understanding these changes requires more than just following current trends and buzzwords; it requires leveraging and integrating scholarly traditions that have long studied work in all its richness.

In this collection, inspired by a workshop at the Academy of Management’s 2022 Annual Meeting, we gather insights from leading experts to explore various scholarly approaches to the study of work.

Why Revisit Old Traditions?

The imperative to revisit established scholarly traditions stems from their enduring relevance. Despite technological advancements and new organizational forms, the core issues surrounding work—its organization, execution, and implications—remain remarkably consistent. Drawing from these historical perspectives prevents us from falling into the trap of “goldfish memory,” so common in organization theory and management, where the past lessons are ignored in the face of new developments.

Our discussion includes seven contributions that provide a comprehensive view of current knowledge and open new avenues for exploration. These contributions cover various aspects of work studies, from group and occupational dynamics to the foundational elements of work and long-term career trajectories.

Work and the Systems Surrounding it

Davide Nicolini revisits the socio-technical systems approach developed by the Tavistock Institute while Ingrid Ericsson examines presents the Computer Supported Cooperative Work tradition (CSCW). Together, these contributions show the promises of thinking of work from a systems perspective and attending to the alignments and misalignments of its components—which may make some work more or less visible than others.

Tasks and Careers: Zooming In and Out on Work

Lisa Cohen and Gina Dokko offer insights into the micro and macro aspects of work. Cohen advocates for a focus on tasks, the most elementary units of work, while Dokko connects work experiences with broader career trajectories, illustrating how job contexts shape and are shaped by long-term career paths.

The Broader Ecology of Work

Arvind Karunakaran and Greetje Corporaal broaden our perspective by examining external factors that influence work. Karunakaran discusses how governmental and informal classifications impact the value and recognition of different types of work. Corporaal cautions against overemphasizing algorithms in changing work dynamics, urging a nuanced understanding of the broader context and actors involved.

Reflecting on the Future

In the concluding piece, Bechky and O’Mahony reflect on what is genuinely new in the study of work. They emphasize the importance of integrating insights from extant scholarship with contemporary research to navigate ongoing transformations and develop robust theories and practices.

Our goal with this curated discussion is to expand our horizons and deepen our understanding of work’s complexities. By building on the scholarly labor of our predecessors, we can better grasp today’s work environment and prepare for future challenges.

Pedro Monteiro (pictured) is an assistant professor at Copenhagen Business School. His academic work examines the organizational challenges of developing, translating, and integrating expertise, primarily in technically or socially complex settings. In this research, he tries to get close to the coalface of work practices. He co-founded the Talking about Organizations Podcast and is an organizer at the Ethnography Atelier. For more information about his scholarly work, please visit http://www.monteiropedro.com/ Davide Nicolini is a professor and the director of IKON (organization and work group) at Warwick Business School. He has research interests in practice-based approaches to the study of knowing, learning, and change in organisations and innovation process in healthcare and other complex environments. Ingrid Erickson is an associate professor at the School of Information Studies at Syracuse University. She is an ethnographer and organizational scholar by training and has research interests in how the values and designs of technologies, especially artificial intelligence, influence how we communicate with one another, navigate and inhabit spaces, and engage in new forms of work. Lisa Cohen is an associate professor in organization behavior and a Desautels Faculty Fellow at McGill University. She received her PhD in business administration from the University of California, Berkely Hass Business School and teaches in the following areas: human resources, talent management, and negotiations. Gina Dokko is a professor at the University of California, Davis Graduate School of Management. She received her PhD from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania and has research interests in careers, job mobility, organization theory, and organizational behavior. Greetje Corporaal is an assistant professor in organization and digitization in the Rotterdam School of Management (RSM) at Erasmus University, Rotterdam. She received her PhD in organization sciences from VU Amsterdam and is the 2019 recipient of a British Academy Postdoctoral Fellowship for the study of work transformation brought about by digital platforms. Arvind Karunakaran is an assistant professor of management science and engineering at Stanford University. He is also a Core faculty of the Center for Work, Technology, and Organization (WTO), Stanford Technology Ventures Program (STVP), and a faculty affiliate of the Stanford Institute for Human-centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI) and the Digital Economy Lab (DEL). Beth Bechky is the Stephen G. Newberry Chair in Leadership at the University of California, Davis' Graduate School of Management. She received her PhD in industrial engineering and engineering management from Stanford University and is an organizational ethnographer by training. Siobhan O’Mahony is a Feld Family Professor in innovation and entrepreneurship, management & organizations and a professor of management & organizations at Boston University. She received her PhD from Stanford University and her MPA from the Cornell University School of Public Affairs.

View all posts by Pedro Monteiro, Davide Nicolini, Ingrid Erickson, Lisa Cohen, Gina Dokko, Greetje Corporaal, Arvind Karunakaran, Beth Bechky, and Siobhan O’Mahony

Related Articles

Turning Real-Life Drama into Scholarly Insight: Lessons from the Wild Boars Rescue
Business and Management INK
August 2, 2024

Turning Real-Life Drama into Scholarly Insight: Lessons from the Wild Boars Rescue

Read Now
Using Advanced Machine Learning to Better Understand the Emotional Intensity of Online Reviews
Business and Management INK
July 31, 2024

Using Advanced Machine Learning to Better Understand the Emotional Intensity of Online Reviews

Read Now
Navigating the Maze of Social Interaction: A Framework for Analysis
Business and Management INK
July 30, 2024

Navigating the Maze of Social Interaction: A Framework for Analysis

Read Now
Exploring LGBTQ+ Marketing Scholarship and Strategies
Business and Management INK
July 29, 2024

Exploring LGBTQ+ Marketing Scholarship and Strategies

Read Now
Exploring the Intersectionality Between Technology Firms and Inequality

Exploring the Intersectionality Between Technology Firms and Inequality

In this article, co-authors Brett Anitra Gilbert and Meredith Burnett reflect on their interests and the inspiration behind their research article, “Firm Heterogeneity and […]

Read Now
We Disagree to Agree: A Call to Apply Agreement Metrics More Extensively for Advancing Management Theory

We Disagree to Agree: A Call to Apply Agreement Metrics More Extensively for Advancing Management Theory

In this article, co-authors Jurgen Willems and Kenn Meyfroodt reflect on the inspiration behind their open-access article, “Group Research: Why are we […]

Read Now
Rethinking Approaches to Management Research During Times Marked by Rare, Yet Increasingly Impactful Events

Rethinking Approaches to Management Research During Times Marked by Rare, Yet Increasingly Impactful Events

In this article, Vanessa C. Hasse reflects upon what drove her interest in researching rare but impactful events, as well as the […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments