Business and Management INK

The Role of Place in Sustainability

October 28, 2024 1027

In this article, co-authors Arno Kourula, Panikos Georgallis, Irene Henriques, and Johanna Mair reflect on the inspiration behind their research article, “Introduction to the Special Issue on the Role of Place in Sustainability: Key Trends and Agenda for Future Research,” published in Organization & Environment.

Many sustainability issues are global, but does this mean that sustainability solutions are placeless? Or are they, instead, place-bound? The special issue on “The Role of Place in Sustainability”, developed in conjunction with the 2022 Conference of the Group for Research on Organizations and the Natural Environment, grapples with this and related questions on the role of place in sustainability.

The editorial article extends the insights from the special issue articles and the broader literature on place and sustainability. The concept of “place” in sustainability is multidimensional, encompassing not only physical locations but also the human and social experiences tied to physical locations. Place is not only a context for business activity, but it is itself continuously shaped by interactions between organizations and their environment.

Research on organizations, management, and international business has recently emphasized the interconnected and global nature of sustainability challenges, and the need for different actors—including for example governments, multinational enterprises, and social movements—to come together to address them. Yet, research also shows that the impacts of challenges such as climate change and subsequent action to address them are highly localized. In other words, sustainability is not “placeless.”

In contrast to recent research that has emphasized the global in addressing sustainability challenges like climate change, this issue revisits the local by focusing on place. We show evidence that research on place and sustainability has been on the rise, and present four special issue articles which draw on diverse contexts—ranging from the Tibetan Plateau to the city of St. Gallen, and from Vancouver Island to the south of France.

Collectively, the special issue articles show how organizations that deeply engage with their local environments and integrate ecological knowledge can drive more effective and enduring sustainability outcomes. They also discuss how diverse constituents with different roles and identities can jointly achieve sustainable placemaking. However, this local focus that makes for successful initiatives may also sometimes limit the ability to transfer sustainability practices to other places.

Relatedly, sustainability practitioners often struggle with the dilemma of “scaling deep” versus “scaling out.” Scaling deep involves intensifying sustainability efforts within a local context, ensuring that these efforts are rooted in place and involve deep understanding of the local context. This involves, for example, engaging with local communities, respecting indigenous knowledge, and adapting sustainability strategies to fit the unique cultural and ecological conditions of each place. Scaling out, on the other hand, involves expanding these practices geographically. This may involve developing strategies that are flexible enough to adapt to different local contexts while maintaining core sustainability principles.

In the editorial, we offer a plea to move beyond the dichotomies that currently dominate scholarly discourse—such as the contrast between universal and pluriversal approaches, and the choice between scaling deep versus scaling out. Instead of treating these as mutually exclusive options, researchers should focus on how these perspectives can be integrated. Central to such an agenda is, we suggest, the need to expand the concept of sense of place to consider the plural “sense of places”— combining experiences from multiple places and contextualizing individual places in relation to others.

Finally, we propose a research agenda on how organizations operate within, with, across, and beyond local environments. Our aim is that this editorial, and the future research it inspires, will help foster sustainability that resonates deeply within local communities while echoing across the world.

Arno Kourula (pictured) is a professor of business & sustainability and the chair of the Strategy and International Business section at the University of Amsterdam. He has research interests in corporate sustainability, cross-sector interaction, and sustainability partnerships and alliances. He is also a section editor of the Journal of Business Ethics. Panikos Georgallis is an associate professor of strategy in the Amsterdam Business School at the University of Amsterdam. He has current research interests in the development of moral markets, business-civil society interactions, and organizational responses to climate change. As a researcher, his work has been published in leading journals such as Administrative Science Quarterly, Organization Science, and Journal of International Business Studies, among others. Irene Henriques is a professor of sustainability and economics and the area coordinator of economics at York University. She has research interests in economics, stakeholder management and sustainability. As a researcher, she is currently examining the role that financial institutions, governments and businesses play in encouraging or discouraging social Indigenous entrepreneurs. Johanna Mair is a professor of organization, strategy and leadership at the Hertie School. She is a Distinguished Fellow at the Stanford Center on Philanthropy and Civil Society and currently serves as an Academic Editor of the Stanford Social Innovation Review. As a researcher, she has a primary research focus on how organizations and innovative forms of organizing can contribute to economic, social, and political progress.

View all posts by Arno Kourula, Panikos Georgallis, Irene Henriques, and Johanna Mair

Related Articles

Navigating CSR Communication in an Age of Polarization
Business and Management INK
December 18, 2024

Navigating CSR Communication in an Age of Polarization

Read Now
What European SMEs Can Teach Us About Innovation and Informal Human Resource Management
Business and Management INK
December 16, 2024

What European SMEs Can Teach Us About Innovation and Informal Human Resource Management

Read Now
When Do You Need to Trust a GenAI’s Input to Your Innovation Process?
Business and Management INK
December 13, 2024

When Do You Need to Trust a GenAI’s Input to Your Innovation Process?

Read Now
Using Intelligent Self-Limitation to Explore the Distinction Between Environment and Umwelt
Business and Management INK
December 6, 2024

Using Intelligent Self-Limitation to Explore the Distinction Between Environment and Umwelt

Read Now
The Authors of ‘Artificial Intelligence and Work’ on Future Risk

The Authors of ‘Artificial Intelligence and Work’ on Future Risk

During the final stages of editing the proofs for Artificial Intelligence and Work: Transforming Work, Organizations, and Society in an Age of Insecurity, […]

Read Now
From Conflict to Peace: Reflecting on the Leadership of John Hume in Northern Ireland

From Conflict to Peace: Reflecting on the Leadership of John Hume in Northern Ireland

In this post, author Joanne Murphy reflects on the life and legacy of John Hume, the topic of her article, “Leadership, liminality, […]

Read Now
The End of Meaningful CSR?

The End of Meaningful CSR?

In this article, co-authors W. Lance Bennet and Julie Uldam reflect on the inspiration behind their research article, “Corporate Social Responsibility in […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments