Business and Management INK

Using Intelligent Self-Limitation to Explore the Distinction Between Environment and Umwelt

December 6, 2024 1450

In this post, author Morten Knudsen reflects on the inspiration behind his article, “Environment and Umwelt: Grand Challenges and Intelligent Self-Limitation,” published in Business & Society. His reflection can be found below the paper’s abstract.

This commentary presents an epistemological perspective on grand challenges (GCs) suggesting that the distinction between Umwelt (what social systems observe) and environment (the surrounding but unobserved world) can help us provide deeper analyses of GCs. I argue that indifference to the environment outside the observed Umwelt is a root cause of GCs and suggest that organizations must compensate for society’s inability to address GCs by developing forms of intelligent self-limitation.

In 1934, the biologist Jakob von Uexküll published the beautiful book A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds. In text and drawings, Uexküll describes what the world looks like from the perspective of various animals. Each creature forms the center of its own world, its Umwelt, which surrounds it like a bubble. Umwelt, Uexküll suggests, is what an organism has access to through its sensory apparatus. The environment, on the other hand, is the world that surrounds the organism but is unobserved by it.

In my commentary, I suggest that the distinction between Umwelt and environment is relevant to the social sciences today because it can help us to provide deeper analyses of grand challenges such as climate change and biodiversity loss. In a capitalist society, the bubble of capital’s Umwelt includes only those elements that are or can be made relevant to exchange values. This results in a marked indifference to the ways in which capitalism and its growth imperative affect and potentially destroy both social and natural preconditions for society that it does not observe as part of its Umwelt.

I suggest that organizations must compensate for society’s indifference to its environment by developing forms of intelligent self-limitation. Intelligent self-limitation means that organizations – based on reflections on the difference between Umwelt and environment, and thus on the unobserved, the unknown – adopt procedures that encourage them to refrain from activities that have a negative impact on the environment. I also argue that research has an important role to play in the development of intelligent self-limitation because it can qualify the political discussion about the conditions of possibility of intelligent self-limitation – when it is possible and when it requires regulation or even revolution to be realized.

Dr. Morten Knudsen is an associate professor at the Department of Organization, Copenhagen Business School. He has research interests in knowledge and ignorance in processes of organizing and management. His primary empirical areas of work are public organizations in Scandinavia, specifically health care, management and leadership development, and, recently, agricultural organizations.

View all posts by Morten Knudsen

Related Articles

Changing the World or Changing Ourselves?
Business and Management INK
March 12, 2025

Changing the World or Changing Ourselves?

Read Now
Generative AI Literacy: A Proposed Way Forward
Business and Management INK
March 11, 2025

Generative AI Literacy: A Proposed Way Forward

Read Now
Exploring the Psychosocial Correlation of Skin Lightening Products
Business and Management INK
February 10, 2025

Exploring the Psychosocial Correlation of Skin Lightening Products

Read Now
Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on the European Union Emission Trading Scheme
Business and Management INK
January 10, 2025

Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on the European Union Emission Trading Scheme

Read Now
Navigating CSR Communication in an Age of Polarization

Navigating CSR Communication in an Age of Polarization

In this article, authors Dennis Schoeneborn, Urša Golob, Hannah Trittin-Ulbrich, Matthias Wenzel, and Amy O’Connor reflect on the inspiration behind their research article, “CSR Communication and […]

Read Now
What European SMEs Can Teach Us About Innovation and Informal Human Resource Management

What European SMEs Can Teach Us About Innovation and Informal Human Resource Management

In this article, co-authors Desiree Meurs, Marise Born, Yolanda Grift, Maaike Lycklama à Nijeholt, and Joop Schippers offer a sneak peek into the inspiration […]

Read Now
When Do You Need to Trust a GenAI’s Input to Your Innovation Process?

When Do You Need to Trust a GenAI’s Input to Your Innovation Process?

In this post, co-authors Frank T. Piller, Tucker J. Marion, and Mahdi Srour reflect on the inspiration behind their research article, “Generative […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments