Research

Mind Games: Social Science Goes to the World Cup Research
Choke: Costa Rica beats Uruguay 3-1

Mind Games: Social Science Goes to the World Cup

June 16, 2014 1007

Uruguay v Costa_Rica

Here’s one definition of “choke”: Costa Rica beats Uruguay 3-1

Fan or foe, chances are over the next four weeks you’ll catch at least parts of World Cup matches, whether through bleary eyes in the wee hours or snippets on the evening news.

If you’re unfamiliar with the rules, or are watching a match and support neither team, understanding the workings of the mind can make any sport more entertaining – especially football.

Here, I offer up some ideas drawn from sport psychology that can both improve your viewing experience and impress your mates.

Choking

My father remains the family champion at almost all sports, due to his ability to induce a choke at key moments. Even when losing, he will simply note: “This would be a bad game to lose from here.”

The Conversation logo_AU

This article by Richard Keegan originally appeared at The Conversation, a Social Science Space partner site, under the title “Mind games: a World Cup guide for armchair psychologists”

By doing so, he ingeniously induces the main symptom of a “choke” – sudden, inexplicable lapses in performance.

But even the world’s best have occasional skill failures that are not technically “chokes.” What defines a choke is an emphasis on social evaluation that provokes increased self-awareness. Experts (at any skill) have automated performance, such that it requires no mental effort.

In contrast, novices analyze the movement using their sophisticated yet slow-and-deliberate conscious mind. Skill learning occurs as we automate the various aspects of the movement, but anything that can persuade the conscious system to step in and take control again – such as pressure and questions – can cause a choke.

Fear of failure

Why do teams become so conservative in the most important matches? I have a stock ice-breaker in teamwork sessions: the floating pole game (see the video below).

The two (only two!) rules of the game translate as:

  1. lower the pole to the ground
  2. don’t mess up!

By flamboyantly enforcing Rule 2, I can almost guarantee the pole will rise, not fall – the exact opposite of winning.

When players focus on avoiding defeat, as opposed to winning, their style of play often becomes risk-averse. Psychologically, “winning” and “not-losing” are very different, even if one should beget the other.

It is worth remembering that it’s not failure we fear, but the consequences of failing (a seven-year-old focus group participant taught me this). This can explain why the quality of the attacking play often deteriorates as the tournament progresses and the stakes get higher.

Groupthink

In a famous experiment, American psychologist Solomon Asch demonstrated how completely normal people often ignore obvious physical evidence (such as “Line A is much longer than Line B”) if the rest of their group all agrees. Watch as a hapless participant yields in the video below.

To players in a team, the difference between “hard uncontrollable reality” and “the way we’re doing things right now” is often blurry.

Therefore if everyone else is quiet, risk-averse and nervy, that attitude becomes normal. In such situations, strong acts of leadership and/ or open, frank communication between players can allow the harmful “norm” to be broken.

However with few opportunities to pause and reflect, it is much easier said than done.

Flow or ‘the zone’

In his autobiography, Brazilian footballing legend Pelé describes being in “the zone” beautifully:

a strange calmness […] a type of euphoria; I felt I could run all day without tiring, that I could dribble through any of their teams or all of them, that I could almost pass through them physically.

Pele was unstoppable when in the zone.

Ironically, athletes performing at their best often remember very little of the experience, and when asked “How did you do that?”, they often reply “I don’t know”.

Time seems to pass quicker, and the player feels totally in control. Notably, the experience always accompanies excellence, never poor performance.

In some ways, flow is the polar opposite of choking; the controlling brain relinquishes control and enjoys the ride (which is invariably a pleasurable experience). The player has confidence to try things they might never ordinarily attempt … and succeed.

Momentum or the ‘run-of-play’

This is a commentators’ favourite. If flow is at the individual level, in this instance we can view momentum as applying at the team level (although individual sports such as tennis and golf can be analysed in terms of “momentum” too).

It can be easily tracked in two-sided games as possession and territory appear to swing from one side to the other. It can change rapidly, and some players even try to manage momentum by feigning injuries or delaying re-starts.

Rousing tackles, runs, shots or saves/blocks can all be seen as momentum-changers, as can refereeing decisions.

Importantly, the team with more momentum tends to be the one that scores – but counter-attacking is a specific tactic often used in football.

‘Understanding’

At a junction today, I knew another car was going to cut across me. No indication; I just knew, and couldn’t tell you exactly why: approach speed? Lane positioning? Something cued me to stop.

In the same way, elite players do not think faster or better per se – they have just developed better mental shortcuts. Technically, these could be called attentional cues (see what Ronaldo sees in the video below):

Using such cues, those who play together a lot simply “know”, often unconsciously, where their compatriot will be – apparently showing some “sixth sense”.

Nevertheless, it is still a guess, and players who have only been playing together a few weeks – as a World Cup often demands – sometimes make odd passes or defend badly because their usual rules or shortcuts don’t work in the new situation.

In the opinion of this psychologist, the mental game is often more interesting than the one on the pitch!The Conversation


Richard Keegan is an assistant professor in sport and exercise psychology at University of Canberra. Specializing in sport and exercise psychology, Keegan arrived at UC having spent six years lecturing at the University of Lincoln (UK). He completed his MSc and PhD at Loughborough University (UK), and before that, a degree in psychology at the University of Bristol. He is a qualified and registered psychologist (AHPRA in Australia and HCPC in the UK), working with athletes across the full range of levels (from beginners to world champions), and in sports ranging through athletics to yachting.

View all posts by Richard Keegan

Related Articles

Exploring the ‘Publish or Perish’ Mentality and its Impact on Research Paper Retractions
Research
October 10, 2024

Exploring the ‘Publish or Perish’ Mentality and its Impact on Research Paper Retractions

Read Now
Megan Stevenson on Why Interventions in the Criminal Justice System Don’t Work
Social Science Bites
July 1, 2024

Megan Stevenson on Why Interventions in the Criminal Justice System Don’t Work

Read Now
How ‘Dad Jokes’ Help Children Learn How To Handle Embarrassment
Insights
June 14, 2024

How ‘Dad Jokes’ Help Children Learn How To Handle Embarrassment

Read Now
How Social Science Can Hurt Those It Loves
Ethics
June 4, 2024

How Social Science Can Hurt Those It Loves

Read Now
Digital Scholarly Records are Facing New Risks

Digital Scholarly Records are Facing New Risks

Drawing on a study of Crossref DOI data, Martin Eve finds evidence to suggest that the current standard of digital preservation could fall worryingly short of ensuring persistent accurate record of scholarly works.

Read Now
Analyzing the Impact: Social Media and Mental Health 

Analyzing the Impact: Social Media and Mental Health 

The social and behavioral sciences supply evidence-based research that enables us to make sense of the shifting online landscape pertaining to mental health. We’ll explore three freely accessible articles (listed below) that give us a fuller picture on how TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, and online forums affect mental health. 

Read Now
New Fellowship for Community-Led Development Research of Latin America and the Caribbean Now Open

New Fellowship for Community-Led Development Research of Latin America and the Caribbean Now Open

Thanks to a collaboration between the Inter-American Foundation (IAF) and the Social Science Research Council (SSRC), applications are now being accepted for […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments