Academic Funding

Social research and public accountability

February 26, 2011 1310

The Campaign for the Public University defends and promotes the idea of university as a public good. The following is an extract from a Campaign blog that argues that publicly produced, publicly available data is vital for public debate.

“Despite the large-scale cuts to the budget for higher education, many commentators have suggested that research has been protected. However, a different picture is now emerging. In particular, it is becoming clear that serious changes to the funding of social science are taking place.

“In fact, the ESRC received a severe cut in its budget of approximately 12% and, at the same time, came under severe pressure to direct its funding towards more narrowly-defined projects. The ESRC now requires that its research have greater engagement with users and that it should outline ‘pathways to impact’, just as these ‘pathways’ will become part of the evaluation of research in the REF (for the purpose of distributing QR funds).

“Short term utilitarian goals for research are now being encouraged (indeed, such a policy was strongly advocated by Lord Browne of Madingley in his role as President of the Royal Academy of Engineering). In the social sciences this is often associated with a call to provide evidence for the development of public policy. However, it now appears that the Government is much more interested in research projects that are based in policy goals, not subjecting them to scrutiny.”

The full post is available at the Campaign for the Public University.

Related Articles

Deciphering the Mystery of the Working-Class Voter: A View From Britain
Insights
November 14, 2024

Deciphering the Mystery of the Working-Class Voter: A View From Britain

Read Now
Julia Ebner on Violent Extremism
Insights
November 4, 2024

Julia Ebner on Violent Extremism

Read Now
Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do
International Debate
October 23, 2024

Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do

Read Now
All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture
Event
October 10, 2024

All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture

Read Now
‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

The term ‘settler colonialism’ was coined by an Australian historian in the 1960s to describe the occupation of a territory with a […]

Read Now
Webinar: Banned Books Week 2024

Webinar: Banned Books Week 2024

As book bans and academic censorship escalate across the United States, this free hour-long webinar gathers experts to discuss the impact these […]

Read Now
Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

The creation of the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) has led to a heated debate on the balance between peer review and evaluative metrics in research assessment regimes. Luciana Balboa, Elizabeth Gadd, Eva Mendez, Janne Pölönen, Karen Stroobants, Erzsebet Toth Cithra and the CoARA Steering Board address these arguments and state CoARA’s commitment to finding ways in which peer review and bibliometrics can be used together responsibly.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments