International Debate

Haven’t the Foggiest Which Weather Stories to Believe?

January 14, 2016 1091

Thundersnow, willy-willys and the hottest/coldest seasons on record, there’s certainly no shortage of headlines about the weather. But many meteorological terms we hear are misused, say early career researchers.

Sense About ScienceFrustrated by headlines of hurricanes hitting the UK and claims that any forecast of snow will be a ‘blizzard,’ today, Voice of Young Science members have launched an online quiz. These early career researchers are challenging everyone to test their weather know-how and arm themselves with the facts to decipher what the next round of weather stories really mean.

Take the quiz now — you can get it here — and warm up your wintery small talk. Did you know:
· A monsoon doesn’t just mean some heavy rain, it’s actually a seasonal wind shift that could even cause a drought.
· “London will be hotter than Athens!” often makes the headlines, but this actually happens about once a month.
· Willy willy is a genuine weather term, meaning a vortex of dust formed by wind.
· Headlines told us that 2012, then 2014 were to be the coldest winters in Britain for 100 years. Both were wrong. The coldest winter was actually back in 1962-63.

Voice of Young Science (VoYS) is a growing network of 2,000+ early career researchers, engineers, scientists and medics who play an active role in public discussions about science. VoYS members inspire their peers and connect with the public on scientific issues by calling out bad science, tackling popular misconceptions around controversial issues, challenging pseudoscientific claims, and responding to misinformation in all kinds of media. Read more about VoYS HERE. VoYS is co-ordinated by Sense About Science, a charity that equips people to make sense of science and evidence.

Comments

Andrew Barrett, meteorologist and VoYS member:
“There is a near constant stream of newspaper headlines about the weather, often they confuse their meteorological terminology and some significantly exaggerate the impact of upcoming severe weather. Rather than trying to respond to every story as it is published, I felt a need to help readers understand when their lives and property are in danger and when forecasts of extreme weather are being exaggerated.”

Chloe Moore, interim public engagement programme manager, The Royal Meteorological Society:
“Taking the quiz is a great, quick way for people to test their meteorological knowledge, which can sometimes be skewed by how the media portray a weather story.”

Georgina Glaser, VoYS member:
“Before contributing to this quiz, I really hadn’t realised the extent to which weather reporting is misleading. Having heard so many stories about hurricanes, I was particularly surprised to hear that one has never actually hit the UK.”

Joanne Thomas, VoYS co-ordinator:
“Clear and accurate information about weather is important, so it’s fantastic to see early career researchers addressing misleading use of weather terms.”

For further information or comments contact Joanne Thomas at jthomas@senseabotuscience.org or 020 7490 9590/07791 136 306, or Chris Peters, cpeters@senseaboutscience.org or 020 7490 9590/07837 394 957.


Sense About Science is a registered charity founded in 2002, to equip people to make sense of science and evidence. We help the public and policy makers in their use of scientific evidence. We tackle misconceptions and respond to public questions on scientific and medical issues. With over 5,000 scientists, from Nobel prize winners to postdocs, we work in partnership with scientific bodies, research publishers, policy makers, the public and the media, to change public discussions about science and evidence. Through award-winning public campaigns, we share the tools of scientific thinking and scrutiny. Our activities and publications are used and shaped by community groups, policy makers, civic bodies, patient organisations, information services, writers, publishers, educators and health services.

View all posts by Sense About Science

Related Articles

Deciphering the Mystery of the Working-Class Voter: A View From Britain
Insights
November 14, 2024

Deciphering the Mystery of the Working-Class Voter: A View From Britain

Read Now
Julia Ebner on Violent Extremism
Insights
November 4, 2024

Julia Ebner on Violent Extremism

Read Now
Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do
International Debate
October 23, 2024

Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do

Read Now
All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture
Event
October 10, 2024

All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture

Read Now
‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

The term ‘settler colonialism’ was coined by an Australian historian in the 1960s to describe the occupation of a territory with a […]

Read Now
Webinar: Banned Books Week 2024

Webinar: Banned Books Week 2024

As book bans and academic censorship escalate across the United States, this free hour-long webinar gathers experts to discuss the impact these […]

Read Now
Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

The creation of the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) has led to a heated debate on the balance between peer review and evaluative metrics in research assessment regimes. Luciana Balboa, Elizabeth Gadd, Eva Mendez, Janne Pölönen, Karen Stroobants, Erzsebet Toth Cithra and the CoARA Steering Board address these arguments and state CoARA’s commitment to finding ways in which peer review and bibliometrics can be used together responsibly.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments