Communication

Archived Webinar: Fostering a Scientifically Informed Populace

October 3, 2016 1959

How do we decide whether to vaccinate our children? Or eat genetically engineered foods? Accept human causes of climate change? Determine whether to take narcotics for pain? Know whether nuclear energy is safe? Democracies depend on educated citizens who can make informed decisions about important scientific topics relevant to their own lives and others’. The vast scientific information available in our digital society can be complex, confusing, and often conflicting – and leads to one meta-question: how do we foster public understanding of science?

Two scholars who investigate how the public learns about science and then chooses to trust it (or not) address that question in this hour-long webinar sponsored by the journal Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences and its parent organization, the Federation of Associations in Behavioral & Brain Sciences (FABBS). The scholars, Barbara K. Hofer and Gale M. Sinatra, co-wrote an article — “Public Understanding of Science: Policy and Educational Implications” — that appears in the current issue of Policy Insights. In that article, and in this webinar, the pair not only discuss some of the more widely bemoaned instances of public mis-understanding of science, but they discuss ways to create ‘instructional scaffolds’ to combat this threat to informed policy choices.

Gale Sinatra and Barbara Hofer

Gale Sinatra and Barbara Hofer

Sinatra is the associate dean for research and professor of education and psychology at the Rossier School of Education at the University of Southern California. She is the past editor of the journal, Educational Psychologist and former Vice President of AERA’s Division C, Learning and Instruction. She is a fellow of American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, and the Society for Text and Discourse. She heads the Motivated Change Research Lab, which aims to understand the cognitive, motivational, and emotional processes that lead to attitude change, conceptual change, and successful STEM learning.

Hofer is a professor of psychology at Middlebury College in the areas of developmental, educational, and cultural psychology, and is a fellow of the American Psychological Association. She received of national awards for both teaching and research, receiving the Review of Research Award from the American Educational Research Association (with Paul Pintrich) and the McKeachie Early Career Teaching Award from the American Psychological Association. In addition to publishing several dozen articles and book chapters, she co-edited the book Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs about Knowledge and Knowing.


Related Articles

Canada’s Storytellers Challenge Seeks Compelling Narratives About Student Research
Communication
November 21, 2024

Canada’s Storytellers Challenge Seeks Compelling Narratives About Student Research

Read Now
Ninth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: Tackling the Gender Pay Gap 
Communication
October 31, 2024

Ninth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: Tackling the Gender Pay Gap 

Read Now
The Conversation Podcast Series Examines Class in British Politics
Communication
October 25, 2024

The Conversation Podcast Series Examines Class in British Politics

Read Now
Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do
International Debate
October 23, 2024

Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do

Read Now
Diving Into OSTP’s ‘Blueprint’ for Using Social and Behavioral Science in Policy

Diving Into OSTP’s ‘Blueprint’ for Using Social and Behavioral Science in Policy

Just in time for this past summer’s reading list, in May 2024 the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (technically, […]

Read Now
Eighth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: How Sexist Abuse Undermines Political Representation 

Eighth Edition of ‘The Evidence’: How Sexist Abuse Undermines Political Representation 

In this month’s issue of The Evidence newsletter, Josephine Lethbridge explores rising levels of abuse directed towards women in politics, spotlighting research […]

Read Now
Revisiting the ‘Research Parasite’ Debate in the Age of AI

Revisiting the ‘Research Parasite’ Debate in the Age of AI

The large language models, or LLMs, that underlie generative AI tools such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT, have an ethical challenge in how they parasitize freely available data.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments