Career

ESRC Announces Finalists for Celebrating Impact Prize

April 30, 2019 1579

Ranging from jurisprudence to autism, the loss of a baby to the growth of equality in science education, the work of the finalists in the seventh annual Celebrating Impact Prize competition —announced today
— represent a broad cross-section of meaningful work from Britain’s social and behavioral researchers.

ESRC Celebrating Impact logo

The Economic and Social Research Council’s Celebrating Impact Prize rewards ESRC-funded researchers who have achieved impact through outstanding research, knowledge exchange activities, collaborative partnerships and engagement with different communities. The ESRC, a public body, is the United Kingdom’s largest funder of research on social and economic questions.

Winners in the four award categories – Outstanding Public Policy Impact, Outstanding Societal Impact, Outstanding International Impact and Outstanding Early Career Impact – will be revealed in a ceremony at the Royal Society on July 9. (SAGE Publishing, the parent of Social Science Space, cosponsors the Early Career award.)

All finalists will see a professionally made film created around their work and its impact, while each winner receives £10,000 to spend on their work or furthering that work’s impact.

Finalists, and their research focus, are:

Louise Archer, Julie Moote, Emily Macleod, Jennifer DeWitt and Becky Francis (University College London) | Improving equity in science participation: impact of the ASPIRES and ASPIRES2 research

Nic Cheeseman, Susan Dodsworth (University of Birmingham), Justin Willis (University of Durham) and Gabrielle Lynch (University of Warwick) | Strengthening elections and accountability in new democracies

Chloe Holloway (University of Nottingham) | Improving the support of autistic individuals detained in police custody

Steve Martin, Dan Bristow and James Downe (Cardiff University; Wales Centre for Public Policy) | Enabling ministers to access and apply evidence that improves policy decisions and delivery

Susan McVie and Lesley McAra (University of Edinburgh) | Edinburgh Study of Youth Transitions and Crime: increasing the age of criminal responsibility in Scotland

Shona Minson (University of Oxford) | Delivering guidance on the sentencing of mothers: safeguarding children’s rights and wellbeing

Kate Reed, Elspeth Whitby (University of Sheffield) and Julie Ellis (University of Huddersfield) | Challenging taboos and changing practice: the case of baby-loss and post-mortem

Entrants’ applications were reviewed by academics, engagement and knowledge exchange experts and research users, and shortlisted applicants were invited to an interview, along with non-academic supporters who helped describe the impact of the work.


The Economic and Social Research council, or ESRC, is the UK's largest organization for funding research on economic and social issues. It supports independent, high quality research which has an impact on business, the public sector and civil society. The ESRC is a non-departmental public body established by Royal Charter in 1965 and receive most of its funding through the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.

View all posts by ESRC

Related Articles

Canada’s Storytellers Challenge Seeks Compelling Narratives About Student Research
Communication
November 21, 2024

Canada’s Storytellers Challenge Seeks Compelling Narratives About Student Research

Read Now
Tom Burns, 1959-2024: A Pioneer in Learning Development 
Impact
November 5, 2024

Tom Burns, 1959-2024: A Pioneer in Learning Development 

Read Now
Alondra Nelson Named to U.S. National Science Board
Announcements
October 18, 2024

Alondra Nelson Named to U.S. National Science Board

Read Now
Viewing 2024 Economics Nobel Through Lens of Colonialism’s Impact on Institutions
Recognition
October 15, 2024

Viewing 2024 Economics Nobel Through Lens of Colonialism’s Impact on Institutions

Read Now
Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

The creation of the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) has led to a heated debate on the balance between peer review and evaluative metrics in research assessment regimes. Luciana Balboa, Elizabeth Gadd, Eva Mendez, Janne Pölönen, Karen Stroobants, Erzsebet Toth Cithra and the CoARA Steering Board address these arguments and state CoARA’s commitment to finding ways in which peer review and bibliometrics can be used together responsibly.

Read Now
Paper to Advance Debate on Dual-Process Theories Genuinely Advanced Debate

Paper to Advance Debate on Dual-Process Theories Genuinely Advanced Debate

Sage 987 Impact

Psychologists Jonathan St. B. T. Evans and Keith E. Stanovich have a history of publishing important research papers that resonate for years.

Read Now
Webinar: Fundamentals of Research Impact

Webinar: Fundamentals of Research Impact

Whether you’re in a research leadership position, working in research development, or a researcher embarking on their project, creating a culture of […]

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments