Impact

Why Social Science? Because It Can Improve the Lives of Those Who Serve Our Country Impact
This article was drawn from the Why Social Science? blog from the Consortium of Social Science Associations, and was originally titled "Because It Generates Solutions That Can Reduce Firearm-Related Harms."

Why Social Science? Because It Can Improve the Lives of Those Who Serve Our Country

November 11, 2019 2433

 Throughout our nation’s history, members of the U.S. military have served our country with honor, courage, and dedication. Service men and women are prepared to mobilize around the globe at a moment’s notice to preserve freedom, protect the common good, and bring relief to disaster-stricken areas. Accomplishing these missions requires personal and professional sacrifices by military families.

Social science has played a key role in helping U.S. service members complete their duties more effectively and more ethically. We highlight four such contributions.

Enhancing Decision Making

“Social science has played a key role in helping U.S. service members complete their duties more effectively and more ethically.”

Military family

Without question, the physical sciences have produced many cutting-edge breakthroughs to assist service members. Advances in technology, transportation, gear, machinery, and medicine (among others) are crucial for equipping military personnel with tools for success.

But the social sciences are pivotal as well. Human factors are critical in sustaining a fit, ready, and principled force. Social scientific advances that assist military personnel have included:

  • Identifying characteristics of ethical leaders,
  • Establishing how to make virtuous decisions in stressful situations,
  • Showing how to build coalitions with citizens from other nations,
  • Illuminating how to maximize the inclusiveness and efficiency of teams,
  • Indicating how to communicate complex data clearly,
  • Revealing how misinformation spreads,
  • Explaining how to respect international cultures,
  • Specifying the economic factors that help organizations retain talented members,
  • Illustrating how to manage power dynamics in work roles, and
  • Demonstrating how political systems operate.

Bridging the Military/Civilian Divide

According to a 2011 Pew Research Center study, fewer U.S. citizens serve in the military today than in past eras, and more than 70 percent of both civilians and veterans believe that the public does not understand the challenges facing military personnel. Most civilians will never have the experience of putting themselves in harm’s way for the sake of serving their country, but thanks to social science, civilians can better appreciate what military life is like.

News media spotlighting sensational cases can convey the misconception that most service members and veterans are distressed. Social science debunks these myths by revealing the resilience of military personnel. For example, Dr. Nina Sayer and her colleagues developed the Military to Civilian Questionnaire to assess challenges transitioning to civilian life (e.g., keeping up friendships, getting along with family, completing school work or paid work, feeling a part of civilian society). A nationally stratified sample of 745 post-9/11 veterans showed low levels of these difficulties, on average (M = 1.36 on a 0 to 4 scale). Many more veterans screened negative (2/3) than positive (1/3) for probable post-traumatic stress disorder.

Military personnel struggling with behavioral health issues need support, and social science provides a basis for designing and evaluating programs to help (see the following section). Yet it is important to keep in mind that the vast majority of service members and veterans are accomplished, productive, and well-adjusted members of society.

Program Effectiveness

Another contribution of social science involves documenting the effectiveness of military support programs offered by nonprofit organizations. Such work employs rigorous social scientific methods to ensure high-quality programming.

WhySocialScience logo_
This post originally appeared on the Why Social Science blog sponsored by the Consortium of Social Science Associations. To view the other posts on that site, click HERE.

For example, the Military Child Education Coalition sponsors research to help military-connected children succeed academically from preschool through college. REBOOT Recovery conducts research to help combat veterans cope with the spiritual wounds of war. The Elizabeth Dole Foundation commissions research to understand the needs of military family caregivers. Blue Star Families conducts an annual survey to document trends in military family life. The Military Family Research Institute at Purdue University relies on social scientific data to train behavioral health professionals to work effectively with military families. All of these innovative programs capitalize on social science to improve their offerings.

Sustaining Military and Veteran Family Relationships

Our own research examines how to help military families communicate effectively in the midst of the challenges they face. For example, Leanne’s research team tracked 555 military couples upon homecoming after deployment to identify recommendations for how to handle reintegration. Steve’s research team compared advice given by parents, spouses, and veterans to identify guidelines for how loved ones can encourage service members or veterans to seek behavioral health care if needed. Both lines of social science are geared toward preserving military family ties, which is important because support from loved ones offers both physical and mental health benefits.

All of these findings showcase the importance of social science in helping people who have worn the uniform. Why social science? Because it can improve the lives of those who serve us all.

Leanne K. Knobloch (pictured) is a professor in the Department of Communication at the University of Illinois and a member of the Science Advisory Board of the Military Child Education Coalition. Her research examines how people communicate during times of transition, with a particular focus on how military families navigate the cycle of deployment and reunion. Steven R. Wilson is a professor in the Department of Communication at the University of South Florida and an affiliated scientist with the Military Family Research Institute at Purdue University. His research focuses on difficult conversations including how military youth manage tensions between privacy and openness when communicating with their deployed and at-home parents, and how military spouses and parents manage dilemmas while encouraging service members or veterans to seek behavioral healthcare.

View all posts by Leanne K. Knobloch and Steven R. Wilson

Related Articles

Canada’s Storytellers Challenge Seeks Compelling Narratives About Student Research
Communication
November 21, 2024

Canada’s Storytellers Challenge Seeks Compelling Narratives About Student Research

Read Now
Deciphering the Mystery of the Working-Class Voter: A View From Britain
Insights
November 14, 2024

Deciphering the Mystery of the Working-Class Voter: A View From Britain

Read Now
Doing the Math on Equal Pay
Insights
November 8, 2024

Doing the Math on Equal Pay

Read Now
Tom Burns, 1959-2024: A Pioneer in Learning Development 
Impact
November 5, 2024

Tom Burns, 1959-2024: A Pioneer in Learning Development 

Read Now
All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture

All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture

With over 50 countries around the world holding major elections during 2024 it has been a hugely significant year for democracy as […]

Read Now
‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

The term ‘settler colonialism’ was coined by an Australian historian in the 1960s to describe the occupation of a territory with a […]

Read Now
Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

The creation of the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) has led to a heated debate on the balance between peer review and evaluative metrics in research assessment regimes. Luciana Balboa, Elizabeth Gadd, Eva Mendez, Janne Pölönen, Karen Stroobants, Erzsebet Toth Cithra and the CoARA Steering Board address these arguments and state CoARA’s commitment to finding ways in which peer review and bibliometrics can be used together responsibly.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments