Business and Management INK

How Thinking Styles Influence Team Innovation

September 6, 2012 1045

Dr. Corinne Post, Lehigh University

Editor’s note: We are pleased to welcome Dr. Corinne Post, Assistant Professor of Management at Lehigh University. Dr. Post, whose research interests include diversity management, performance, and innovation, published “Deep-Level Team Composition and Innovation: The Mediating Roles of Psychological Safety and Cooperative Learning” on August 30, 2012 in Group & Organization Management.

***

There has been a lot of attention on how the diversity of knowledge held among team members may influence a team’s capacity to innovate. I argue that the way team members think—that is, the ways in which they process information—also influence a team’s ability to innovate (above and beyond the variety of knowledge held by team members.)

Findings from a National Science Foundation (NSF) supported study, using a sample of 83 natural innovation teams, support my argument. The results of the study, to be published in Group & Organization Management later this year, show that thinking styles indirectly influence team innovation by shaping teams’ interpersonal dynamics. Sequential, analytical thinking decreases team innovation by inhibiting psychological safety, while holistic, connective thinking improves team innovation by facilitating cooperative learning among members.

The findings from this study are especially noteworthy because they show that the relationship between team members’ cognitive styles and team innovation is independent from the relationship between knowledge variety and innovation. Hence, thinking styles should be considered an important area of investigation, distinct from the work on informational diversity, in further efforts to unpack the team composition / team performance puzzle.

Managers, who are often encouraged to compose teams with diverse task-relevant experts in order to put knowledge diversity at the service of innovation, should also consider members’ thinking styles when putting together innovation teams because the pooled cognitive styles of members appear to influence team innovation above and beyond the functional variety represented by team members.

Follow this link to read Dr. Post’s article in Group & Organization Management. Would you like to keep up with the latest research on this topic? Click here to sign up for customizable e-alerts!

 

Business and Management INK puts the spotlight on research published in our more than 100 management and business journals. We feature an inside view of the research that’s being published in top-tier SAGE journals by the authors themselves.

View all posts by Business & Management INK

Related Articles

Canada’s Storytellers Challenge Seeks Compelling Narratives About Student Research
Communication
November 21, 2024

Canada’s Storytellers Challenge Seeks Compelling Narratives About Student Research

Read Now
Boards and Internationalization Speed
Business and Management INK
November 18, 2024

Boards and Internationalization Speed

Read Now
Our Open-Source Tool Allows AI-Assisted Qualitative Research at Scale
Innovation
November 13, 2024

Our Open-Source Tool Allows AI-Assisted Qualitative Research at Scale

Read Now
How Managers Can Enhance Trust
Business and Management INK
November 11, 2024

How Managers Can Enhance Trust

Read Now
The Role of Place in Sustainability

The Role of Place in Sustainability

In this article, co-authors Arno Kourula, Panikos Georgallis, Irene Henriques, and Johanna Mair reflect on the inspiration behind their research article, “Introduction to the Special Issue […]

Read Now
Turning to Glitter in Management Studies – Why We Should Take ‘Unserious’ Glitter Serious to Understand New Management Practices

Turning to Glitter in Management Studies – Why We Should Take ‘Unserious’ Glitter Serious to Understand New Management Practices

In this article, author Jette Sandager reflects on the inspiration behind her research article, “The sensuous governmentality of glitter: Educating managing women scientists […]

Read Now
Utilizing Academic-Practitioner Partnering for Societal Impact

Utilizing Academic-Practitioner Partnering for Societal Impact

In this article, co-authors Natalie Slawinski, Bruna Brito, Jennifer Brenton, and Wendy Smith reflect on the inspiration behind their research article, “Reflections on deep academic–practitioner partnering for generative societal impact,” published in Strategic Organization.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments