Videos

Deborah Lupton Looks at Why More People Don’t Exit Facebook

December 3, 2021 1858

Given the issues that swirling around Facebook – and here’s a handy list of 16 of them – you might wonder why users don’t more often just pack up and move away from the world’s most-used social media platform (which may go some way in answering the question already).

This question animated Deborah Lupton, a sociologist with the Vitalities Lab of the Centre for Social Research in Health and Social Policy Research Centre at the University of New South Wales, and Clare Southerton, a postdoctoral research fellow at the lab. In March, their paper, “The thing-power of the Facebook assemblage: Why do users stay on the platform?” appeared in the Journal of Sociology and detailed seven case studies of Australian Facebook users and what drove them to stay, go or take a break from Facebook.

In the video below, the first of the Journal of Sociology Author Interview series, Associate Editor Brady Robards talks to Lupton about this staying power, a subject even more timely since this video first appeared in March.

One quick takeaway – the people Lupton and Southerton talked to were not unduly fussed about things like privacy or being exploited by Facebook, and yet those in turn are the big issues that drive negative coverage of the platform. What did drive thoughts of departing was ending the time-suck or frustration with other people’s oversharing.

The Journal of Sociology is published in association with The Australian Sociological Association.

Related Articles

Deciphering the Mystery of the Working-Class Voter: A View From Britain
Insights
November 14, 2024

Deciphering the Mystery of the Working-Class Voter: A View From Britain

Read Now
Julia Ebner on Violent Extremism
Insights
November 4, 2024

Julia Ebner on Violent Extremism

Read Now
Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do
International Debate
October 23, 2024

Emerson College Pollsters Explain How Pollsters Do What They Do

Read Now
All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture
Event
October 10, 2024

All Change! 2024 – A Year of Elections: Campaign for Social Science Annual Sage Lecture

Read Now
‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

‘Settler Colonialism’ and the Promised Land

The term ‘settler colonialism’ was coined by an Australian historian in the 1960s to describe the occupation of a territory with a […]

Read Now
Webinar: Banned Books Week 2024

Webinar: Banned Books Week 2024

As book bans and academic censorship escalate across the United States, this free hour-long webinar gathers experts to discuss the impact these […]

Read Now
Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

Research Assessment, Scientometrics, and Qualitative v. Quantitative Measures

The creation of the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) has led to a heated debate on the balance between peer review and evaluative metrics in research assessment regimes. Luciana Balboa, Elizabeth Gadd, Eva Mendez, Janne Pölönen, Karen Stroobants, Erzsebet Toth Cithra and the CoARA Steering Board address these arguments and state CoARA’s commitment to finding ways in which peer review and bibliometrics can be used together responsibly.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments