Industry

DORA Announces Three-Year Plan For Research Assessment Reform

April 6, 2023 1398
Full color logo for DORA, the Declaration on Research Assessment

The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment, DORA, a statement of principles and organization, has promoted global research evaluation reform and received extensive support since its inception in 2013. According to its website, 20,044 individuals and organizations in 160 countries have signed DORA, demonstrating its commitment to responsible research assessment.

To advance its efforts, the organization announced its new three-year strategic plan, which consists of four objectives designed to guide DORA’s work through 2026. These goals will reinforce the organization’s vision “to advance practical and robust approaches to research assessment globally and across all scholarly disciplines.”

The objectives are to increase awareness of the harm from research assessments that depend on inappropriate metrics, and the benefits of other evaluation efforts. The overall intent is to advance the development of clear and concrete measures to improve research assessment, to support advocates for research evaluation reform and to gain funding that will help further the organization’s mission.

“There remains a pressing need to increase the scale, pace and impact of reform, and to ensure that commitment to the declaration on paper results in meaningful change on the ground,” the strategic plan reads.

To help form its plan, DORA’s steering committee of publishers, researchers and other qualified individuals sought out guidance from the global research community by distributing a survey and conducting several informal interviews.

The organization released its first strategic plan in 2018 and was able to achieve the goals it set by increasing awareness of DORA, promoting the use of tools to implement reform and expanding the scope of the organization.

“We have been much more proactive as an organization in moving the debate along through hosting meetings and turning up at other conferences and collaborating with other organizations, learned societies and founders to develop alternative, more robust approaches to deliver a more holistic approach to research assessment,” said Stephen Curry, DORA chair, in a 2022 interview with Social Science Space.

Read the full strategic plan here: DORA Strategic Plan 2023-2026 FINAL (sfdora.org)

Emma Richards is a student at the University of Florida studying public relations. She is the social science communications intern at Sage Publishing.

View all posts by Emma Richards

Related Articles

Let’s Return to Retractions Being Corrective, Not Punitive
Communication
July 15, 2024

Let’s Return to Retractions Being Corrective, Not Punitive

Read Now
Uncovering ‘Sneaked References’ in an Article’s Metadata
Communication
July 11, 2024

Uncovering ‘Sneaked References’ in an Article’s Metadata

Read Now
Megan Stevenson on Why Interventions in the Criminal Justice System Don’t Work
Social Science Bites
July 1, 2024

Megan Stevenson on Why Interventions in the Criminal Justice System Don’t Work

Read Now
How ‘Dad Jokes’ Help Children Learn How To Handle Embarrassment
Insights
June 14, 2024

How ‘Dad Jokes’ Help Children Learn How To Handle Embarrassment

Read Now
How Social Science Can Hurt Those It Loves

How Social Science Can Hurt Those It Loves

David Canter rues the way psychologists and other social scientists too often emasculate important questions by forcing them into the straitjacket of limited scientific methods.

Read Now
Opportunity to Participate in RFI on Proposed National Secure Data Service

Opportunity to Participate in RFI on Proposed National Secure Data Service

According to the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, scientific collaboration and diplomacy are key when trying to effectively address the […]

Read Now
Why Social Science? Because It Can Help Contribute to AI That Benefits Society

Why Social Science? Because It Can Help Contribute to AI That Benefits Society

Social sciences can also inform the design and creation of ethical frameworks and guidelines for AI development and for deployment into systems. Social scientists can contribute expertise: on data quality, equity, and reliability; on how bias manifests in AI algorithms and decision-making processes; on how AI technologies impact marginalized communities and exacerbate existing inequities; and on topics such as fairness, transparency, privacy, and accountability.

Read Now
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments