Book Review: Exploring, Understanding, and Managing Organizational Paradoxes
In this article, V Kalyani provides brief insights into her recently published book review, entitled “Book Review: Organizational Paradox,” published in Management Communication Quarterly.
The Motivations Behind My Research
The inspiration to delve into the intricate world of organizational paradoxes stemmed from recognizing the pervasive and dynamic contradictions inherent in organizational life. As a management scholar, I was particularly motivated by the need to provide a nuanced understanding of how these paradoxes influence organizational behavior and communication processes. I aimed to bridge the gap between theory and practice, offering a theoretical framework and practical strategies for managing these contradictions.
External Influences
The evolving complexities significantly influenced my decision to pursue this research in modern organizations. The political, social, and economic turbulence of recent years highlighted the need for organizations to navigate competing demands effectively. This external environment underscored the importance of understanding paradoxes not as problems to be solved but as opportunities for innovation and growth.
Challenges and Surprises
One of the most challenging aspects of my research was distinguishing between paradoxes and related concepts such as trade-offs, dilemmas, and dialectics. This differentiation is crucial for accurately analyzing and managing organizational tensions. Surprisingly, I found that embracing paradoxes rather than seeking to resolve them often leads to innovative solutions and sustained organizational performance. This counterintuitive finding reinforced the value of paradoxical thinking in management.
Innovative Contributions
My research is innovative in its comprehensive approach to understanding and managing organizational paradoxes. I introduced practical strategies such as acceptance, confrontation, and transcendence, emphasizing the importance of embracing contradictions. By providing a detailed examination of the triggers and manifestations of paradoxes, I believe this approach will significantly impact the field by encouraging organizations to view paradoxes as integral to their operations rather than anomalies to be eliminated.
Unpublished Insights
There were several interesting insights that did not make it into the published manuscript. For instance, we explored the ontological debate on whether paradoxes are inherent or socially constructed, a discussion that adds depth to the understanding of organizational contradictions. Moreover, effects of language in creating and managing paradoxes, a topic that warrants further exploration.
Advice for New Scholars
For new scholars entering the field, my advice is to embrace the complexities of organizational life and view paradoxes as opportunities rather than challenges. Developing a paradoxical mindset is crucial for navigating the dynamic tensions in organizations. Additionally, grounding your research in both theory and practice will provide a more comprehensive understanding and practical applicability of the findings.
Influential Scholarship
The most influential piece of scholarship I have read in the past year is Fairhurst and Putnam’s (2023) Performing Organizational Paradoxes. This work extends my understanding of the performative effects of language in organizational paradoxes, offering valuable insights into how contradictions are enacted and managed in practice.
Reflecting on our research journey, I am convinced that understanding and managing organizational paradoxes is crucial for contemporary organizations. The book work in Organizational Paradox contributes significantly to this field by providing a robust framework and practical strategies for embracing and leveraging contradictions. I am excited to share these insights with the broader academic and practitioner communities through this blog.
