LSE Impact

How Does Journal Standardization Impact Intellectual Creativity?
Insights
November 2, 2022

How Does Journal Standardization Impact Intellectual Creativity?

Read Now
Editormetrics – We’ve Created a FAIR Dataset of Journal Editors to Benefit Researchers
Innovation
October 20, 2022

Editormetrics – We’ve Created a FAIR Dataset of Journal Editors to Benefit Researchers

Read Now
An Introvert’s Guide to Academic Networking and Hybrid Events
Insights
October 7, 2022

An Introvert’s Guide to Academic Networking and Hybrid Events

Read Now
The Foundational Myths of Open Access Still Shape How We View It
Communication
September 30, 2022

The Foundational Myths of Open Access Still Shape How We View It

Read Now
Andy Tattersall Identifies the Four Styles of Research Communication

Andy Tattersall Identifies the Four Styles of Research Communication

Research communication can often seem like a monolith, if you want to take your research beyond the walls of the university then do x-y-z. As Andy Tattersall describes, there are in fact many hands and styles of work that contribute to effective research communications.

Read Now
Whither Nudge? The Debate Itself Offers Lessons on the Influence of Social Science

Whither Nudge? The Debate Itself Offers Lessons on the Influence of Social Science

The story of the book ‘Nudge’ offers insights into what can happen when research has an unpredictably large impact in the world of politics and policy

Read Now
Introducing The Publish Your Reviews Initiative for Preprints

Introducing The Publish Your Reviews Initiative for Preprints

Ludo Waltman and Jessica Polka make the case for a more contextualized approach to open access publishing and preprinting, and introduce the Publish Your Reviews initiative.

Read Now
How Three False Starts Stifle Open Social Science

How Three False Starts Stifle Open Social Science

Patrick Dunleavy argues that there have already been three false starts in open science: focusing only on isolated bits of the open agenda in ways that don’t connect and so are not meaningful; loading researchers with off-putting, external bureaucratic requirements; and risking reopening ‘sectarian’ divides between quantitative and qualitative social scientists.

Read Now
We Developed a Tool to Make Responsible Research and Innovation Easier

We Developed a Tool to Make Responsible Research and Innovation Easier

Stefan de Jong, Michael J. Bernstein and Ingeborg Meijer describe their work developing a tool that helps researchers and research funders to incorporate responsible research and innovation values into their work.

Read Now
We Cannot Cite Our Way to Equality, But Citational Justice Is Vital

We Cannot Cite Our Way to Equality, But Citational Justice Is Vital

Reflecting on their work to create a guide to fairer citation practices in academic writing, Aurélie Carlier, Hang Nguyen, Lidwien Hollanders, Nicole Basaraba, Sally Wyatt and Sharon Anyango*, highlight challenges to changing citation practices and point to ways in which authors and readers can work towards equitable citations.

Read Now
Who Actually Makes Use of Open Access Research? We Looked at US National Academies Reports

Who Actually Makes Use of Open Access Research? We Looked at US National Academies Reports

Drawing on a dataset covering over a million user comments about their use of US National Academies consensus study reports, Ameet Doshi, Diana Hicks, Matteo Zullo and Omar I. Asensio find widespread use of open research in the public sphere.

Read Now
Where Does ‘Post-Naive’ Science Diplomacy Go From Here?

Where Does ‘Post-Naive’ Science Diplomacy Go From Here?

Doubravka Olšáková and Sam Robinson, argue that we are at the beginning of a new era of ‘post naïve’ science diplomacy. 

Read Now

Subscribe to our mailing list

Get the latest news from the social and behavioral science community delivered straight to your inbox.